CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Commencement Date in Insurance Policies: Policy Becomes Effective from Issuance or Reinstatement Date

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment regarding Insurance Law, the Supreme Court of India has brought clarity to the interpretation of life insurance policy terms, particularly regarding the effective commencement date and the application of suicide clauses. The bench, comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Rajesh Bindal, delivered a decisive verdict in the case of "2024 INSC 10", involving disputes related to Reliance Life Insurance Company Ltd.

The apex court, in its judgment, stated, "The policy becomes effective from the date of its issuance or the date of any reinstatement of the policy." This observation is set to have significant implications on the way insurance policies are interpreted and enforced in the country.

The case revolved around two appeals filed by Reliance Life Insurance Company Ltd. against orders by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, which had earlier ruled in favor of the policyholders. The crux of the dispute was determining the effective date of policy commencement – whether it should be the date of policy issuance, the date mentioned in the policy, or the date of issuance of the deposit receipt or cover note.

In a detailed judgment, the court underscored the importance of adhering to the terms and conditions specified in insurance contracts. Justice Nath, in his ruling, emphasized, "Once it is mentioned in the Policy that the 12 months period is to commence from the date of the issuance of the policy or the date of any reinstatement of the policy, the reinstatement aspect ought to have been considered." This clarification by the Supreme Court has resolved a long-standing ambiguity in the insurance sector.

The ruling also addressed the application of the suicide clause in life insurance policies, an area that has seen varied interpretations in the past. The court's interpretation that the commencement date is tied to the date of policy issuance or reinstatement aligns with the contractual nature of insurance policies.

The judgment drew upon precedents set in earlier cases, such as "Life Insurance Corporation of India and Another vs. Dharam Vir Anand" and "Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Mani Ram," reinforcing the judicial stance on the strict interpretation of contractual terms in insurance policies.

Date of Decision: 03-Jan-2024

RELIANCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. VS JAYA WADHWANI

 

Latest Legal News