MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Clarifies Classification of Products under Kerala VAT Ac

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India provided clarity on the classification of certain products under the Kerala Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act, 2003. The case involved the classification of Mosquito Mats, Coils, and Vaporizers; Mortein Insect Killers; Harpic Toilet Cleaner; Lizol Floor Cleaners; and Dettol Antiseptic Liquid.

The appellant contended that the products should be classified under Entry No. 44(5) (insecticides) or Entry 36(8)(h)(vi) (medicaments) of the KVAT Act. However, the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes rejected these claims, and the High Court upheld the Commissioner's classification.

After examining the relevant entries in the KVAT Act, the Supreme Court ruled that Mosquito Mats, Coils, and Vaporizers; Mortein Insect Killers should be classified under Sl. No. 66 of Notification SRO 82/06 dated 21.01.2006 as "Mosquito Repellants," attracting a tax rate of 12.5%.

Similarly, Harpic Toilet Cleaner and Lizol Floor Cleaners were classified under Entry 27(4) of Notification SRO 82/06, with a tax rate of 12.5% applicable to these products.

In the case of Dettol Antiseptic Liquid, the Supreme Court held that it should be classified as a medicament under Entry 36(8)(h)(vi) of Schedule III of the KVAT Act, attracting a tax rate of 4%. The court considered the active ingredients and dominant use of Dettol, emphasizing its therapeutic and prophylactic properties.

The Supreme Court also referred to the decisions of the Guwahati High Court and Rajasthan High Court, which had classified Dettol as a drug under their respective VAT Acts. The court upheld these decisions.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court reiterated the principles of classification, including the plain meaning of taxing provisions, the burden of proof on the Revenue, resolving ambiguity in favor of the assessee, the overriding effect of specific entries over residuary entries, and resorting to the residuary entry as a last measure.

As a result of the judgment, the classification for Mosquito Mats, Coils, and Vaporizers; Harpic Toilet Cleaner; and Lizol Floor Cleaners was confirmed, while the classification for Dettol Antiseptic Liquid was set aside, classifying it as a medicament with a tax rate of 4%.

DATE OF DECISION: April 10, 2023

 M/s Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd.   vs Commissioner Commercial Taxes & Ors.   

Latest Legal News