Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Supreme Court Clarifies Classification of Products under Kerala VAT Ac

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India provided clarity on the classification of certain products under the Kerala Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act, 2003. The case involved the classification of Mosquito Mats, Coils, and Vaporizers; Mortein Insect Killers; Harpic Toilet Cleaner; Lizol Floor Cleaners; and Dettol Antiseptic Liquid.

The appellant contended that the products should be classified under Entry No. 44(5) (insecticides) or Entry 36(8)(h)(vi) (medicaments) of the KVAT Act. However, the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes rejected these claims, and the High Court upheld the Commissioner's classification.

After examining the relevant entries in the KVAT Act, the Supreme Court ruled that Mosquito Mats, Coils, and Vaporizers; Mortein Insect Killers should be classified under Sl. No. 66 of Notification SRO 82/06 dated 21.01.2006 as "Mosquito Repellants," attracting a tax rate of 12.5%.

Similarly, Harpic Toilet Cleaner and Lizol Floor Cleaners were classified under Entry 27(4) of Notification SRO 82/06, with a tax rate of 12.5% applicable to these products.

In the case of Dettol Antiseptic Liquid, the Supreme Court held that it should be classified as a medicament under Entry 36(8)(h)(vi) of Schedule III of the KVAT Act, attracting a tax rate of 4%. The court considered the active ingredients and dominant use of Dettol, emphasizing its therapeutic and prophylactic properties.

The Supreme Court also referred to the decisions of the Guwahati High Court and Rajasthan High Court, which had classified Dettol as a drug under their respective VAT Acts. The court upheld these decisions.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court reiterated the principles of classification, including the plain meaning of taxing provisions, the burden of proof on the Revenue, resolving ambiguity in favor of the assessee, the overriding effect of specific entries over residuary entries, and resorting to the residuary entry as a last measure.

As a result of the judgment, the classification for Mosquito Mats, Coils, and Vaporizers; Harpic Toilet Cleaner; and Lizol Floor Cleaners was confirmed, while the classification for Dettol Antiseptic Liquid was set aside, classifying it as a medicament with a tax rate of 4%.

DATE OF DECISION: April 10, 2023

 M/s Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd.   vs Commissioner Commercial Taxes & Ors.   

Similar News