CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Cancel Default Bail: Ongoing Investigation of Other Accused No Ground Of Bail U/S 167(2) Cr.P.C.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India overturned the decisions of the High Court and the Special Court in the case of Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Kapil Wadhawan & Anr (2024 INSC 58), which had earlier granted default bail to the respondents under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.).

The apex court, led by Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Pankaj Mithal, highlighted the criticality of a complete chargesheet in determining the entitlement to statutory bail. The bench clarified, “Once the chargesheet has been filed, the question of grant of bail has to be considered and decided only with reference to the merits of the case.” This observation underlines the court’s stringent stance on the prerequisites for granting default bail.

The case stemmed from the CBI’s appeal challenging the High Court’s order which upheld the grant of default bail to Kapil Wadhawan and another respondent. The respondents were implicated in a large-scale financial fraud, accused of conspiring to cheat a consortium of banks led by the Union Bank of India. The CBI arrested the respondents in July 2022, and a chargesheet was filed within the stipulated time frame.

In its detailed judgement, the Supreme Court underscored the necessity of a complete investigation as per Section 173 Cr.P.C. before considering default bail. The court noted, “The benefit of proviso appended to sub-section (2) of Section 167 of the Code would be available to the offender only when a chargesheet is not filed and the investigation is kept pending against him.”

Setting aside the orders of the lower courts, the Supreme Court directed that the respondents, if released on default bail pursuant to the impugned orders, shall be taken into custody. However, the court was careful to state that the observations made in this judgement should not influence other proceedings, if any, pending before the Special Court or High Court.

Date of Decision: 24th January 2024

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION VS KAPIL WADHAWAN & ANR

 

Latest Legal News