Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Cancel Default Bail: Ongoing Investigation of Other Accused No Ground Of Bail U/S 167(2) Cr.P.C.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India overturned the decisions of the High Court and the Special Court in the case of Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Kapil Wadhawan & Anr (2024 INSC 58), which had earlier granted default bail to the respondents under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.).

The apex court, led by Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Pankaj Mithal, highlighted the criticality of a complete chargesheet in determining the entitlement to statutory bail. The bench clarified, “Once the chargesheet has been filed, the question of grant of bail has to be considered and decided only with reference to the merits of the case.” This observation underlines the court’s stringent stance on the prerequisites for granting default bail.

The case stemmed from the CBI’s appeal challenging the High Court’s order which upheld the grant of default bail to Kapil Wadhawan and another respondent. The respondents were implicated in a large-scale financial fraud, accused of conspiring to cheat a consortium of banks led by the Union Bank of India. The CBI arrested the respondents in July 2022, and a chargesheet was filed within the stipulated time frame.

In its detailed judgement, the Supreme Court underscored the necessity of a complete investigation as per Section 173 Cr.P.C. before considering default bail. The court noted, “The benefit of proviso appended to sub-section (2) of Section 167 of the Code would be available to the offender only when a chargesheet is not filed and the investigation is kept pending against him.”

Setting aside the orders of the lower courts, the Supreme Court directed that the respondents, if released on default bail pursuant to the impugned orders, shall be taken into custody. However, the court was careful to state that the observations made in this judgement should not influence other proceedings, if any, pending before the Special Court or High Court.

Date of Decision: 24th January 2024

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION VS KAPIL WADHAWAN & ANR

 

Latest Legal News