Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Petitioner Did Not Endorse Part-Payments on Cheque; Section 138 NI Act Not Attracted: Madras High Court Minority Christian Schools Not Bound by Rules of 2018; Disciplinary Proceedings Can Continue: High Court of Calcutta Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Supreme Court Awards ₹1.54 Crores to HIV-Positive Air Force Officer for Medical Negligence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking verdict, the Supreme Court of India has awarded ₹1.54 crores in compensation to a former Indian Air Force (IAF) officer who contracted HIV due to medical negligence. The judgment, delivered on September 26, 2023, emphasizes the importance of upholding the dignity and honour of armed forces personnel and calls for effective implementation of the HIV and AIDS (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017.

The Supreme Court Bench, comprising Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, underscored the duty of state functionaries, including the armed forces, to maintain the highest standards of safety, well-being, and medical fitness for personnel. The court expressed concern over the lack of dignity, honour, and compassion displayed in the appellant's treatment, stating that no amount of monetary compensation can fully restore the harm caused by such behaviour.

Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, while delivering the judgment, remarked, "People sign up to join the armed forces with considerable enthusiasm and a sense of patriotic duty... Any flagging from these standards...entails a loss of confidence in the personnel, undermines their morale, and injects a sense of bitterness and despair."

The appellant, an HIV-positive former IAF officer, had sought compensation for medical negligence that led to his condition. The court found the respondents, including the IAF and the Indian Army, vicariously liable for the negligence and jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation.

Justice Dipankar Datta explained, "The appellant is entitled to compensation, calculated at ₹1,54,73,000/- towards compensation on account of medical negligence of the respondents, who are held liable for the injury suffered by the appellant."

Furthermore, the judgment issued comprehensive directions to the Central and State Governments for the effective implementation of the HIV and AIDS (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017. These directions include providing diagnostic facilities, treatment, welfare schemes, property protection, information and education programs, and safe working environments for HIV-positive individuals.

The court emphasized the need for a compassionate and timely response to the medical needs of the appellant, who requires ongoing care due to his HIV-positive condition. It directed the respondents to extend full cooperation to the appellant for his future medical treatment and bimonthly medical check-ups.

The Supreme Court also acknowledged the valuable assistance provided by the amicus, Ms. Meenakshi Arora (Senior Advocate), and the persistence of the appellant in seeking justice. It awarded costs of ₹5,00,000/- to the appellant and an honorarium of ₹50,000/- to the amicus, Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, who compiled the paper-book.

This landmark judgment not only recognizes the rights and dignity of individuals living with HIV but also sends a powerful message about the responsibilities of state functionaries, especially in the context of the armed forces, to uphold the welfare and honor of their personnel.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2023

CPL ASHISH KUMAR CHAUHAN (RETD.) vs COMMANDING OFFICER & ORS.     

Similar News