MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Awards Compensation in Fire Insurance Claim, Sets Aside NCDRC Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India ruled on a fire insurance claim case, providing compensation to the appellant and setting aside the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). The case involved M/s Super Label Mfg. Co. as the appellant and New India Assurance Company Limited as the respondent.

M/s Super Label Mfg. Co., a registered partnership firm engaged in the printing of high technology labels, had imported sophisticated machinery and obtained a 'Standard Fire and Special Perils' insurance policy from New India Assurance Company Limited. A fire occurred in their factory, causing significant damage to the machinery and other property. The appellant filed a claim for compensation, but the respondent limited the reimbursement amount, leading to a dispute.

 The Supreme Court examined the surveyor's report, which assessed the loss suffered by the appellant, but emphasized that the surveyor's report is not binding or conclusive.

- The Court considered other reports and evidence to determine the extent of damage and compensation.

- It emphasized the concept of proximate cause, noting that the fire was the active and efficient cause of the damage to the machinery.

- The Court found that the NCDRC's narrow construction of the case, focusing on the duration of corrosion, was unjustified.

- Taking into account the chain of events and expert opinions, the Court awarded compensation to the appellant, limiting the claim to the actual loss suffered.

- The respondent was directed to pay the balance amount with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the complaint filed before the NCDRC.

The Supreme Court's judgment in the fire insurance claim case provides clarity on the assessment of loss, the relevance of surveyor's reports, and the determination of compensation based on the chain of events. The Court's decision sets aside the NCDRC order and ensures appropriate compensation for the appellant.

Date of Decision : May 16, 2023

M/s Super Label Mfg. Co.   vs New India Assurance Company Limited

 

Latest Legal News