Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

Supreme Court Awards Compensation in Fire Insurance Claim, Sets Aside NCDRC Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India ruled on a fire insurance claim case, providing compensation to the appellant and setting aside the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). The case involved M/s Super Label Mfg. Co. as the appellant and New India Assurance Company Limited as the respondent.

M/s Super Label Mfg. Co., a registered partnership firm engaged in the printing of high technology labels, had imported sophisticated machinery and obtained a 'Standard Fire and Special Perils' insurance policy from New India Assurance Company Limited. A fire occurred in their factory, causing significant damage to the machinery and other property. The appellant filed a claim for compensation, but the respondent limited the reimbursement amount, leading to a dispute.

 The Supreme Court examined the surveyor's report, which assessed the loss suffered by the appellant, but emphasized that the surveyor's report is not binding or conclusive.

- The Court considered other reports and evidence to determine the extent of damage and compensation.

- It emphasized the concept of proximate cause, noting that the fire was the active and efficient cause of the damage to the machinery.

- The Court found that the NCDRC's narrow construction of the case, focusing on the duration of corrosion, was unjustified.

- Taking into account the chain of events and expert opinions, the Court awarded compensation to the appellant, limiting the claim to the actual loss suffered.

- The respondent was directed to pay the balance amount with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the complaint filed before the NCDRC.

The Supreme Court's judgment in the fire insurance claim case provides clarity on the assessment of loss, the relevance of surveyor's reports, and the determination of compensation based on the chain of events. The Court's decision sets aside the NCDRC order and ensures appropriate compensation for the appellant.

Date of Decision : May 16, 2023

M/s Super Label Mfg. Co.   vs New India Assurance Company Limited

 

Latest Legal News