Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs

Supreme Court Allows Late Submission of Documents in Civil Dispute, Imposes Rs. 40,000 Cost"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant order, the Supreme Court of India today allowed the impleadment and late submission of documents by the appellants in the civil appeal Nos.1249-1250 of 2024, originating from SLP(Civil) Nos.15634-15635 of 2023. This judgment comes as a relief to Bollam Komala & Ors., the appellants in a property dispute case, against the respondents Perla Komuraiah & Ors.

The bench, comprising Justices Bela M. Trivedi and Pankaj Mithal, overturned the decision of the High Court of Telangana. The High Court had earlier dismissed the revision petitions filed by the appellants, pertaining to the late submission of documents in a case that has been ongoing since 2012.

The Supreme Court observed, "Nonetheless, having regard to the provisions contained in Rule 1A of Order VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, and having regard to the fact that the documents in question were already referred to by the appellants in their written statement, as also taking into consideration the affidavit filed by the appellants, explaining the reasons as to why the same were not produced earlier, we are inclined to accept the present appeals." This observation highlights the Court's inclination to ensure justice by considering all relevant materials, even if submitted late.

Furthermore, the apex court imposed a cost of Rs. 40,000 on the appellants, directing them to pay the respondents within two weeks. The court underscored the importance of the timely submission of documents but also showed leniency considering the explanation provided by the appellants.

In a directive aimed at expediting the long-pending suit, the Supreme Court ordered, "It is directed that the trial shall be expedited and completed in accordance with law, preferably within six months." The bench emphasized the need for both parties to cooperate with the Trial Court in proceeding further with the trial.

Date of Decision: 25th January 2024

BOLLAM KOMALA & ORS. VS PERLA KOMURAIAH & ORS.

 

Latest Legal News