Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

Supreme Court Affirms the Right of Multiple Consumers to File Joint Complaints under Consumer Protection Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On May 15, 2023, In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court upheld the rights of multiple consumers to join together and file joint complaints under the Consumer Protection Act. The ruling, delivered by a bench comprising Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Justice M.M. Sundresh, clarified the provisions relating to the filing of complaints by consumers and their representatives.

Court referred to earlier decisions, including the case of Brigade Enterprises Ltd. v. Anil Kumar Virmani (2022) 4 SCC 138, which emphasized that a joint complaint can be filed by a few consumers with the same interest, even if it is not on behalf of or for the benefit of numerous consumers. The court rejected the argument that the use of the term "a consumer" in Section 2(5)(i) excludes more than one person, pointing out that Section 2(5)(vi) recognizes the rights of legal heirs or legal representatives in case of a consumer's death.

The court further held that the word "consumer" in singular form, as used in the Consumer Protection Act, should also be understood to include the plural form. It emphasized that the Act allows for joint complaints and does not prohibit consumers with a common interest from joining together to file a single complaint. The court also noted that the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act are in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law, including the Code of Civil Procedure.

Supreme Court set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, directing the National Commission to hear the matters on merits expeditiously.

Date of Decision: May 15th, 2023

Alpha G184 Owners Association  vs Magnum International Trading Company Pvt. Ltd.    

 

Latest Legal News