Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Supreme Court Affirms Full Input Tax Credit for Manufacturers, Says "Deeming Fiction Cannot Be Disputed"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling on November 6, 2023, the Supreme Court of India set a significant precedent by allowing full Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008. The decision was handed down by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, and Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, who collectively observed that the "deeming fiction provided in Explanation (iii) to Section 13 forbids the Assessing Authority as well as the assessee from raising any dispute in regard to the allowability of the ITC in cases where exempted goods are being produced as a by-product or waste product."

The case involved M/S Modi Naturals Ltd., an appellant against the Commissioner of Commercial Tax UP, challenging the denial of full ITC on the purchase of raw Rice Bran used in manufacturing Rice Bran Oil, a taxable good, and De-Oiled Rice Bran, an exempt by-product. In a thorough analysis of the UP VAT Act's provisions, the apex court overturned the decision of the High Court of Allahabad, which had previously sided with the revenue authorities.

Justice J.B. Pardiwala, authoring the judgment, underscored the legislative intent behind the UP VAT Act, emphasizing that the statutory provisions do not differentiate between exempt and taxable goods for the purpose of claiming ITC. The Court reinstated the orders of the Commercial Tax Tribunal, which had initially favored the assessee's claim.

The Supreme Court's judgment is seen as a significant victory for manufacturers in the state of Uttar Pradesh. It clarifies the legal position regarding the entitlement to full ITC when both taxable goods and exempt by-products are generated in the manufacturing process. Legal experts suggest that this ruling will likely have widespread implications for the manufacturing sector, potentially influencing similar cases across the country.

Arvind Datar, the learned Senior Counsel representing the assessee, lauded the judgment as a triumph of clear statutory interpretation over a restrictive reading of the law. Meanwhile, the revenue's representative, R.K. Raizada, was reminded by the Court that "every Act of Parliament must be read according to the natural construction of its words," and that the subject is not to be taxed without clear words for that purpose.

As businesses across the state and the country evaluate the judgment's ramifications, the Supreme Court's affirmation of the deeming fiction in the UP VAT Act is set to become a cornerstone of tax jurisprudence in India.

Date of Decision: 06 November  2023.

M/S MODI NATURALS LTD VS THE COMMISSIONER OF  COMMERCIAL TAX UP    

Latest Legal News