Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Affirms Full Input Tax Credit for Manufacturers, Says "Deeming Fiction Cannot Be Disputed"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling on November 6, 2023, the Supreme Court of India set a significant precedent by allowing full Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008. The decision was handed down by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, and Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, who collectively observed that the "deeming fiction provided in Explanation (iii) to Section 13 forbids the Assessing Authority as well as the assessee from raising any dispute in regard to the allowability of the ITC in cases where exempted goods are being produced as a by-product or waste product."

The case involved M/S Modi Naturals Ltd., an appellant against the Commissioner of Commercial Tax UP, challenging the denial of full ITC on the purchase of raw Rice Bran used in manufacturing Rice Bran Oil, a taxable good, and De-Oiled Rice Bran, an exempt by-product. In a thorough analysis of the UP VAT Act's provisions, the apex court overturned the decision of the High Court of Allahabad, which had previously sided with the revenue authorities.

Justice J.B. Pardiwala, authoring the judgment, underscored the legislative intent behind the UP VAT Act, emphasizing that the statutory provisions do not differentiate between exempt and taxable goods for the purpose of claiming ITC. The Court reinstated the orders of the Commercial Tax Tribunal, which had initially favored the assessee's claim.

The Supreme Court's judgment is seen as a significant victory for manufacturers in the state of Uttar Pradesh. It clarifies the legal position regarding the entitlement to full ITC when both taxable goods and exempt by-products are generated in the manufacturing process. Legal experts suggest that this ruling will likely have widespread implications for the manufacturing sector, potentially influencing similar cases across the country.

Arvind Datar, the learned Senior Counsel representing the assessee, lauded the judgment as a triumph of clear statutory interpretation over a restrictive reading of the law. Meanwhile, the revenue's representative, R.K. Raizada, was reminded by the Court that "every Act of Parliament must be read according to the natural construction of its words," and that the subject is not to be taxed without clear words for that purpose.

As businesses across the state and the country evaluate the judgment's ramifications, the Supreme Court's affirmation of the deeming fiction in the UP VAT Act is set to become a cornerstone of tax jurisprudence in India.

Date of Decision: 06 November  2023.

M/S MODI NATURALS LTD VS THE COMMISSIONER OF  COMMERCIAL TAX UP    

Latest Legal News