MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Affirms Full Input Tax Credit for Manufacturers, Says "Deeming Fiction Cannot Be Disputed"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling on November 6, 2023, the Supreme Court of India set a significant precedent by allowing full Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008. The decision was handed down by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, and Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, who collectively observed that the "deeming fiction provided in Explanation (iii) to Section 13 forbids the Assessing Authority as well as the assessee from raising any dispute in regard to the allowability of the ITC in cases where exempted goods are being produced as a by-product or waste product."

The case involved M/S Modi Naturals Ltd., an appellant against the Commissioner of Commercial Tax UP, challenging the denial of full ITC on the purchase of raw Rice Bran used in manufacturing Rice Bran Oil, a taxable good, and De-Oiled Rice Bran, an exempt by-product. In a thorough analysis of the UP VAT Act's provisions, the apex court overturned the decision of the High Court of Allahabad, which had previously sided with the revenue authorities.

Justice J.B. Pardiwala, authoring the judgment, underscored the legislative intent behind the UP VAT Act, emphasizing that the statutory provisions do not differentiate between exempt and taxable goods for the purpose of claiming ITC. The Court reinstated the orders of the Commercial Tax Tribunal, which had initially favored the assessee's claim.

The Supreme Court's judgment is seen as a significant victory for manufacturers in the state of Uttar Pradesh. It clarifies the legal position regarding the entitlement to full ITC when both taxable goods and exempt by-products are generated in the manufacturing process. Legal experts suggest that this ruling will likely have widespread implications for the manufacturing sector, potentially influencing similar cases across the country.

Arvind Datar, the learned Senior Counsel representing the assessee, lauded the judgment as a triumph of clear statutory interpretation over a restrictive reading of the law. Meanwhile, the revenue's representative, R.K. Raizada, was reminded by the Court that "every Act of Parliament must be read according to the natural construction of its words," and that the subject is not to be taxed without clear words for that purpose.

As businesses across the state and the country evaluate the judgment's ramifications, the Supreme Court's affirmation of the deeming fiction in the UP VAT Act is set to become a cornerstone of tax jurisprudence in India.

Date of Decision: 06 November  2023.

M/S MODI NATURALS LTD VS THE COMMISSIONER OF  COMMERCIAL TAX UP    

Latest Legal News