CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Acquits in High-Profile Murder Case: Questions Reliability of Forensic Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment that has sent ripples through the legal community, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, overturned a previous murder conviction, citing significant doubts about the reliability and sufficiency of forensic evidence. The case, which has captured public attention, concluded on January 5, 2024, with the acquittal of the appellant previously convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The apex court’s decision focused heavily on the inconsistencies in the forensic evidence presented by the prosecution. In their keenly observed judgment, the justices noted, “The FSL report states that the blood on the sticks, blood-stained pants, and the blood group of the deceased is the same ‘O+.’ This is not an indication of the guilt.” This critical observation raised questions about the conclusive nature of such forensic findings in criminal trials.

Further, the court highlighted the discrepancies in the recovery of evidence. “Nothing of these recoveries took place in the presence of an independent witness,” the judgment pointed out, underlining the importance of transparency and procedural rigor in criminal investigations.

The case, originally resulting in a life sentence, was built on circumstantial evidence and witness testimonies, which the Supreme Court found to be fraught with improbabilities and inconsistencies. The justices emphasized the necessity of having indisputable evidence to convict in cases reliant on circumstantial evidence.

Date of Decision: January 5, 2024

 PRADEEP KUMAR VS STATE OF HARYANA   

 

Latest Legal News