Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Poisoning Case - Prosecution Failed to Conclusively Prove Cause of Death.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment dated November 7th, 2023, the Supreme Court of India overturned the conviction of an individual sentenced to life imprisonment for the alleged poisoning of Bisahu Singh. The bench, comprising Justices Bela M. Trivedi and Dipankar Datta, declared, “the prosecution had failed to conclusively prove that the substances found in the Viscera of the deceased were poisonous and the final cause of death,” leading to the acquittal of the appellant accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The case, which stemmed from the death of Bisahu Singh in 2003, saw the appellant, Hariprasad @ Kishan Sahu, convicted of murder by the Trial Court and the High Court of Chhattisgarh. However, the Supreme Court scrutinized the one-year delay in the registration of the First Information Report (FIR) and the reliability of the dying declarations made by the deceased to his family members.

Justice Trivedi, authoring the judgment, noted, “mere delay in registering the FIR could not be held to be a ground adverse to the case of prosecution.” The apex court further underscored the necessity for concrete evidence in cases of alleged poisoning, referencing the criteria established in the precedent-setting case Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra.

The judgment also highlighted that the FIR is a corroborative piece of evidence, not a substantive one, and that the delay, in this case, was due to the time taken to receive the Forensic Science Laboratory report.

This decision has reaffirmed the legal principle that convictions should be based on firm evidence beyond reasonable doubt, which was not met in this instance. The appellant, Hariprasad @ Kishan Sahu, has been acquitted of all charges, and his bail bonds have been ordered to be canceled forthwith. This ruling has significant implications for the standards of evidence required in criminal proceedings, particularly in cases involving allegations of poisoning.

Date of Decision: 07 November 2023

HARIPRASAD @ KISHAN SAHU VS  STATE OF CHHATTISGARH         

Latest Legal News