Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Poisoning Case - Prosecution Failed to Conclusively Prove Cause of Death.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment dated November 7th, 2023, the Supreme Court of India overturned the conviction of an individual sentenced to life imprisonment for the alleged poisoning of Bisahu Singh. The bench, comprising Justices Bela M. Trivedi and Dipankar Datta, declared, “the prosecution had failed to conclusively prove that the substances found in the Viscera of the deceased were poisonous and the final cause of death,” leading to the acquittal of the appellant accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The case, which stemmed from the death of Bisahu Singh in 2003, saw the appellant, Hariprasad @ Kishan Sahu, convicted of murder by the Trial Court and the High Court of Chhattisgarh. However, the Supreme Court scrutinized the one-year delay in the registration of the First Information Report (FIR) and the reliability of the dying declarations made by the deceased to his family members.

Justice Trivedi, authoring the judgment, noted, “mere delay in registering the FIR could not be held to be a ground adverse to the case of prosecution.” The apex court further underscored the necessity for concrete evidence in cases of alleged poisoning, referencing the criteria established in the precedent-setting case Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra.

The judgment also highlighted that the FIR is a corroborative piece of evidence, not a substantive one, and that the delay, in this case, was due to the time taken to receive the Forensic Science Laboratory report.

This decision has reaffirmed the legal principle that convictions should be based on firm evidence beyond reasonable doubt, which was not met in this instance. The appellant, Hariprasad @ Kishan Sahu, has been acquitted of all charges, and his bail bonds have been ordered to be canceled forthwith. This ruling has significant implications for the standards of evidence required in criminal proceedings, particularly in cases involving allegations of poisoning.

Date of Decision: 07 November 2023

HARIPRASAD @ KISHAN SAHU VS  STATE OF CHHATTISGARH         

Latest Legal News