Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Poisoning Case - Prosecution Failed to Conclusively Prove Cause of Death.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment dated November 7th, 2023, the Supreme Court of India overturned the conviction of an individual sentenced to life imprisonment for the alleged poisoning of Bisahu Singh. The bench, comprising Justices Bela M. Trivedi and Dipankar Datta, declared, “the prosecution had failed to conclusively prove that the substances found in the Viscera of the deceased were poisonous and the final cause of death,” leading to the acquittal of the appellant accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The case, which stemmed from the death of Bisahu Singh in 2003, saw the appellant, Hariprasad @ Kishan Sahu, convicted of murder by the Trial Court and the High Court of Chhattisgarh. However, the Supreme Court scrutinized the one-year delay in the registration of the First Information Report (FIR) and the reliability of the dying declarations made by the deceased to his family members.

Justice Trivedi, authoring the judgment, noted, “mere delay in registering the FIR could not be held to be a ground adverse to the case of prosecution.” The apex court further underscored the necessity for concrete evidence in cases of alleged poisoning, referencing the criteria established in the precedent-setting case Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra.

The judgment also highlighted that the FIR is a corroborative piece of evidence, not a substantive one, and that the delay, in this case, was due to the time taken to receive the Forensic Science Laboratory report.

This decision has reaffirmed the legal principle that convictions should be based on firm evidence beyond reasonable doubt, which was not met in this instance. The appellant, Hariprasad @ Kishan Sahu, has been acquitted of all charges, and his bail bonds have been ordered to be canceled forthwith. This ruling has significant implications for the standards of evidence required in criminal proceedings, particularly in cases involving allegations of poisoning.

Date of Decision: 07 November 2023

HARIPRASAD @ KISHAN SAHU VS  STATE OF CHHATTISGARH         

Latest Legal News