Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Landmark Corruption Case, Quashes Convictions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling today, the Supreme Court of India acquitted the accused in a high-profile corruption case, setting aside their convictions and quashing the judgments of the lower courts.

The bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal pronounced the landmark judgment, which highlighted procedural violations and a failure to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The judgment emphasized the lack of specific allegations and findings against the appellants A-1, A-3, and A-4 under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Court pointed out that the Trial Court and the High Court erred in convicting A-4 without proper application of mind and without any specific allegation or finding on merits. Furthermore, the conviction of A-4 under Section 193 IPC was deemed unsustainable due to the violation of Section 195(1)(b)(i) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Regarding appellant A-7, who was charged with forgery and cheating, the Supreme Court noted the failure of the prosecution to establish the handwriting and signatures of A-7 on demand draft applications. The Court held that the reasoning adopted by the Trial Court and the High Court was flawed, and the High Court's use of an improper procedure under Section 73 of the Evidence Act further compounded the error. Consequently, the conviction of A-7 was also set aside.

Quoting from the judgment, the bench stated, "The conviction of A-4 by the Trial Court as confirmed by the High Court is wholly unsustainable and is liable to be set aside." Additionally, the Court declared, "The finding recorded by the Trial Court and the High Court as though A-7 committed forgery and cheating by making applications for the issue of demand drafts in the names of bogus firms is wholly unsustainable."

The Supreme Court's decision in this case highlights the importance of upholding procedural requirements and ensuring the burden of proof is met beyond a reasonable doubt. The acquittal of the accused serves as a reminder of the judiciary's commitment to fairness and justice.

Date of Decision: June 15, 2023

A. SRINIVASULU vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE   

Latest Legal News