Mere Allegations of Harassment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail to Wife in Matrimonial Suicide Case 'Convenience Of Wife Not A Thumb Rule, But Custody Of Minor Child Is A Weighing Aspect': Punjab & Haryana HC Transfers Divorce Case To Rohtak MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Cooperative Society Is A “Veritable Party” To Arbitration Clause In Flat Agreements, Temple Trust Entitled To Arbitrate As Non-Signatory: Bombay High Court State Government Cannot Review Its Own Revisional Orders Under Section 41(3): Allahabad High Court Affirms Legal Bar on Successive Reviews When Several Issues Arise, Courts Must Answer Each With Reasons: Supreme Court Automatic Retention Trumps Lessee Tag: Calcutta High Court Declares Saregama India ‘Raiyat’, Directs Reconsideration of Land Conversion Application Recovery of Valid Ticket Raises Presumption of Bona Fide Travel – Burden Shifts to Railways: Delhi High Court Restores Railway Accident Claim Failure to Frame Issue on Limitation Vitiates Award of Compensation Under Telegraph Act: Gauhati High Court Sets Aside Order, Remands Matter Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Heritable Right: Gujarat High Court Rejects 9-Year Delayed Claim, Orders Re-Issuance of ₹4 Lakh Compensation Court Cannot Rewrite Contracts to Suit Contractor’s Convenience: Kerala High Court Upholds Termination of Road Work Under Risk and Cost Clause Post-Bail Conduct Is Irrelevant in Appeal Against Grant of Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Crucial Distinction Between Appeal and Cancellation Granting Anticipatory Bail to a Long-Absconding Accused Makes a Mockery of the Judicial Process: Supreme Court Cracks Down on Pre-Arrest Bail in Murder Case Recognition as an Intangible Asset Does Not Confer Ownership: Supreme Court Draws a Sharp Line Between Accounting Entries and Property Rights IBC Cannot Be the Guiding Principle for Restructuring the Ownership and Control of Spectrum: Supreme Court Reasserts Public Trust Over Natural Resources Courts Cannot Convict First and Search for Law Later: Supreme Court Faults Prosecution for Ignoring Statutory Foundation in Cement Case When the Law Itself Stood Withdrawn, How Could Its Violation Survive?: Supreme Court Quashes 1994 Cement Conviction Under E.C. Act Ten Years Means Ten Years – Not a Day Less: Supreme Court Refuses to Dilute Statutory Experience Requirement for SET Exemption SET in Malayalam Cannot Qualify You to Teach Economics: Supreme Court Upholds Subject-Specific Eligibility for HSST Appointments Outsourcing Cannot Become A Tool To Defeat Regularization: Supreme Court On Perennial Nature Of Government Work Once Similarly Placed Workers Were Regularized, Denial to Others Is Discrimination: Supreme Court Directs Regularization of Income Tax Daily-Wage Workers Right To Form Association Is Protected — But Not A Right To Run It Free From Regulation: Supreme Court Recalibrates Article 19 In Sports Governance S. Nithya Cannot Be Transplanted Into Cricket: Supreme Court Shields District Cricket Bodies From Judicially Imposed Structural Overhaul Will | Propounder Must Dispel Every Suspicious Circumstance — Failure Is Fatal: : Punjab & Haryana High Court Electronic Evidence Authenticity Jeopardized by Unexplained Delay and Procedural Omissions: MP High Court Rejects Belated 65B Application Not Answering to the Questions of the IO Would Not Ipso Facto Mean There Is Non-Cooperation: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Undertaking to Satisfy Award Is Not Waiver of Appeal: Supreme Court Restores Insurer’s Statutory Right

Supreme Court Accepts Recommendations for Revision of Pension and Retirement Benefits for Judicial Officers

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On May 19, 2023, In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has accepted the recommendations made by the Commission for the revision of pension and retirement benefits for judicial officers. The bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, issued the verdict on May 19, 2023.

The judgment primarily focuses on various aspects related to pension, family pension, gratuity, and financial assistance in case of death for judicial officers. The Court emphasized the need for uniformity and parity in the pension and retirement benefits across different jurisdictions. The key highlights of the judgment are as follows:

No Change in Percentage of Pension: The Court upheld the current percentage of pension, fixed at 50% of the last drawn pay for pension and 30% for family pension, for retirees on or after January 1, 2016 (Para 86).

Revised Pension: The Court accepted the recommendation that the revised pension for retired judicial officers should be 50% of the last drawn pay of the post held at the time of retirement (Para 87).

Multiplier and Fitment of Pensioners in Pay Matrix: The Court endorsed the application of a multiplier of 2.81 to pensioners and the fitting of pensioners into the pay matrix, ensuring parity among judicial officers who retired at the same level but under different pay scales (Para 88-90).

Consequential Re-fixation of Judicial Officers: The Court directed the states to extend the benefits of re-fixation of pension to those judicial officers who retired before January 1, 1996, if it has not already been done (Para 91-92).

Benefit of Years of Practice at the Bar: The Court accepted the recommendation to consider the number of years of practice at the Bar, subject to a maximum weightage of ten years, while calculating pension and other retiral benefits for direct recruits of Higher Judicial Services (Para 93).

Family Pension: The Court upheld the existing percentage of family pension at 30% of the last drawn pay and recommended the payment of family pension to eligible family members after the death of the spouse (Para 94-95).

Additional Quantum of Pension/Family Pension: The Court accepted the recommendation for the payment of an additional quantum of pension from the age of 75 years onwards, with the possibility for states to continue providing the benefit up to the age of 75 years (Para 98-102).

Gratuity: The Court directed the calculation of gratuity on par with the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, with a maximum limit of Rs. 20 lakhs, subject to an increase of 25% whenever DA rises by 50% (Para 103-104).

Retirement Age: The Court did not recommend any change in the retirement age of judicial officers, which remains at 60 years (Para 107).

Financial Assistance in Case of Death: The Court accepted the recommendation for the payment of family pension and death cum retirement gratuity to the spouse/dependent of a deceased judicial officer (Para 108).

The Court directed the concerned authorities, including the High Courts and states, to implement the necessary amendments in the Service Rules within three months. Compliance affidavits regarding the clearance of arrears of pay and the revised rates of pension must be filed within four months. The revised rates of pension will be payable from July 1, 2023, and the payment of arrears will be completed in three installments by December 31, 2023.

Date of Decision: May 19, 2023

All India Judges Association   vs    Union of India & Ors.       

Latest Legal News