Section 498A IPC | Asking Daughter-In-Law To Do Household Chores Like Washing Clothes & Utensils Does Not Amount To 'Cruelty': Bombay High Court Section 306 IPC | Instigation Can Be Inferred From Continued Harassment, Absence Of Suicide Note No Ground For Discharge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Gift Of Temple Inam Land Void Ab Initio, Incapable Of Government Sanction Or Valid Registration: Supreme Court Section 483 BNSS | Pursuing Parallel Remedies & Suppressing Rejection Of Interim Relief Amounts To Abuse Of Process; Uberrima Fides Essential For Bail: Supreme Court Suit For Possession Simpliciter Not Maintainable When Registered Sale Deed Casts Serious Cloud On Title; Declaration Or Cancellation Mandatory: Supreme Court Representation Of People Act | Private Complaint By Voter Maintainable For False Nomination Affidavit, Section 195 CrPC Bar Inapplicable: Supreme Court Gravity Of Allegations Cannot Eclipse Other Bail Considerations Or Justify Indefinite Pre-Trial Detention: Supreme Court Contract Act | Agreement To Sell Not Enforceable Contract Prior To Conveyance Deed; State Can Re-Auction For Price Maximisation: Supreme Court Failure To Consider Incident Video Footage & Section 161 CrPC Witness Statements Vitiates Grant Of Bail: Supreme Court Section 125 CrPC | Adverse Finding Of Adultery Cannot Be Recorded Against Specifically Named Co-Adulterer Without Giving Opportunity Of Hearing: Allahabad High Court Order 6 Rule 17 CPC | Amendment Of Pleadings To Correct Typographical Errors Should Be Allowed To Ensure True Facts Are Before Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Major Penalty Of Removal From Service Cannot Be Imposed Without Departmental Inquiry: Bombay High Court Quashes Order Under General Insurance Rules Section 482 CrPC | High Court Cannot Quash FIR When Allegations Of Forgery And Fraud Raise Disputed Questions Of Fact: Delhi High Court Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Quashed In Entirety Merely Because Section 498A IPC Is Not Sustainable Due To Invalid Marriage: Calcutta High Court Section 138 NI Act | Arraigning Company As Accused Imperative To Prosecute Managing Director Or Signatory: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 14(6) DRC Act | 5-Year Bar On Eviction Inapplicable When Co-Owners Acquire Premises Inter Se Family Through Gift Deed: Delhi High Court Territorial Jurisdiction In Missing Person Cases | Court Can Direct CBI Probe If Journey Commenced Within Its Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Future Prospects Must Be Added In Permanent Disability Cases Even If Functional Disability Is Assessed Liberally: Punjab & Haryana High Court Registration Act | Registering Authority Lacks Power To Refuse Registration On Grounds Of Unapproved Layout Or Lack Of Title: Telangana High Court

Supreme Court Accepts Recommendations for Revision of Pension and Retirement Benefits for Judicial Officers

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


On May 19, 2023, In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has accepted the recommendations made by the Commission for the revision of pension and retirement benefits for judicial officers. The bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, issued the verdict on May 19, 2023.

The judgment primarily focuses on various aspects related to pension, family pension, gratuity, and financial assistance in case of death for judicial officers. The Court emphasized the need for uniformity and parity in the pension and retirement benefits across different jurisdictions. The key highlights of the judgment are as follows:

No Change in Percentage of Pension: The Court upheld the current percentage of pension, fixed at 50% of the last drawn pay for pension and 30% for family pension, for retirees on or after January 1, 2016 (Para 86).

Revised Pension: The Court accepted the recommendation that the revised pension for retired judicial officers should be 50% of the last drawn pay of the post held at the time of retirement (Para 87).

Multiplier and Fitment of Pensioners in Pay Matrix: The Court endorsed the application of a multiplier of 2.81 to pensioners and the fitting of pensioners into the pay matrix, ensuring parity among judicial officers who retired at the same level but under different pay scales (Para 88-90).

Consequential Re-fixation of Judicial Officers: The Court directed the states to extend the benefits of re-fixation of pension to those judicial officers who retired before January 1, 1996, if it has not already been done (Para 91-92).

Benefit of Years of Practice at the Bar: The Court accepted the recommendation to consider the number of years of practice at the Bar, subject to a maximum weightage of ten years, while calculating pension and other retiral benefits for direct recruits of Higher Judicial Services (Para 93).

Family Pension: The Court upheld the existing percentage of family pension at 30% of the last drawn pay and recommended the payment of family pension to eligible family members after the death of the spouse (Para 94-95).

Additional Quantum of Pension/Family Pension: The Court accepted the recommendation for the payment of an additional quantum of pension from the age of 75 years onwards, with the possibility for states to continue providing the benefit up to the age of 75 years (Para 98-102).

Gratuity: The Court directed the calculation of gratuity on par with the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, with a maximum limit of Rs. 20 lakhs, subject to an increase of 25% whenever DA rises by 50% (Para 103-104).

Retirement Age: The Court did not recommend any change in the retirement age of judicial officers, which remains at 60 years (Para 107).

Financial Assistance in Case of Death: The Court accepted the recommendation for the payment of family pension and death cum retirement gratuity to the spouse/dependent of a deceased judicial officer (Para 108).

The Court directed the concerned authorities, including the High Courts and states, to implement the necessary amendments in the Service Rules within three months. Compliance affidavits regarding the clearance of arrears of pay and the revised rates of pension must be filed within four months. The revised rates of pension will be payable from July 1, 2023, and the payment of arrears will be completed in three installments by December 31, 2023.

Date of Decision: May 19, 2023

All India Judges Association   vs    Union of India & Ors.       

Latest Legal News