Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Suppression of Criminal Case Involvement Disqualifies Candidate from Police Job: Supreme Court”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 20 October 2023, In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that the suppression of involvement in a criminal case, even if followed by acquittal, can disqualify a candidate from securing a job in the police force. The decision came in the case of The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, versus J. Raghunees, in Civil Appeal No. 1183 of 2012.

The bench, led by Justice Pankaj Mithal, observed, “Information given by the candidate to the employer as to his conviction, acquittal, arrest, or pendency of a criminal case, whether before or after entering into service must be true and there should be no suppression or false mention of required information.”

The case revolved around the respondent, J. Raghunees, who was selected as a Grade-II Constable but failed to disclose his prior involvement in a criminal case during the verification process. Although he had been acquitted in the case, the court found that his failure to provide this information constituted suppression of material facts.

The court further emphasized that even if a candidate makes a truthful declaration of a concluded criminal case, the employer retains the right to consider the candidate’s antecedents and is not compelled to appoint them. In Raghunees’ case, the non-disclosure of his involvement in the criminal case, despite subsequent acquittal, raised doubts about his character and antecedents, leading to his disqualification from employment.

The judgment highlights the importance of complete and honest disclosure in matters of employment eligibility, particularly in the recruitment of individuals to disciplined forces such as the police. The decision reinforces the principle that candidates must provide accurate information about their criminal history, regardless of the outcome, to maintain transparency and integrity in the recruitment process.

This ruling serves as a reminder to job seekers that withholding information related to criminal cases can have serious consequences, even if they have been acquitted, and underscores the need for full transparency when applying for positions in the public service, especially law enforcement agencies.

Date of Decision: 20 October  2023

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE TAMILNADU, vs RAGHUNEES       

Similar News