Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Suppression of Criminal Case Involvement Disqualifies Candidate from Police Job: Supreme Court”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 20 October 2023, In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that the suppression of involvement in a criminal case, even if followed by acquittal, can disqualify a candidate from securing a job in the police force. The decision came in the case of The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, versus J. Raghunees, in Civil Appeal No. 1183 of 2012.

The bench, led by Justice Pankaj Mithal, observed, “Information given by the candidate to the employer as to his conviction, acquittal, arrest, or pendency of a criminal case, whether before or after entering into service must be true and there should be no suppression or false mention of required information.”

The case revolved around the respondent, J. Raghunees, who was selected as a Grade-II Constable but failed to disclose his prior involvement in a criminal case during the verification process. Although he had been acquitted in the case, the court found that his failure to provide this information constituted suppression of material facts.

The court further emphasized that even if a candidate makes a truthful declaration of a concluded criminal case, the employer retains the right to consider the candidate’s antecedents and is not compelled to appoint them. In Raghunees’ case, the non-disclosure of his involvement in the criminal case, despite subsequent acquittal, raised doubts about his character and antecedents, leading to his disqualification from employment.

The judgment highlights the importance of complete and honest disclosure in matters of employment eligibility, particularly in the recruitment of individuals to disciplined forces such as the police. The decision reinforces the principle that candidates must provide accurate information about their criminal history, regardless of the outcome, to maintain transparency and integrity in the recruitment process.

This ruling serves as a reminder to job seekers that withholding information related to criminal cases can have serious consequences, even if they have been acquitted, and underscores the need for full transparency when applying for positions in the public service, especially law enforcement agencies.

Date of Decision: 20 October  2023

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE TAMILNADU, vs RAGHUNEES       

Latest Legal News