State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Marriage Cannot Be Perpetuated on Paper When Cohabitation Has Ceased for Decades: Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Grant Divorce Despite Wife’s Opposition Ownership of Trucks Does Not Mean Windfall Compensation: Supreme Court Slashes Inflated Motor Accident Award in Absence of Documentary Proof Concealment of Mortgage Is Fraud, Not a Technical Omission: Supreme Court Restores Refund Decree, Slams High Court’s Remand State Reorganization Does Not Automatically Convert Cooperative Societies into Multi-State Entities: Supreme Court Rejects Blanket Interpretation of Section 103 Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication

State Cannot Extract Work for Decades and Then Deny Regularization: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The main legal issue addressed in the judgement concerns the regularization of a long-serving employee who has been working under temporary and contingent conditions without official recognition or proper benefits.

Facts and Issues: The appellant, Food Corporation of India (FCI), challenged the decision of a single judge which directed the regularization of Smt G Mary’s services as Safaiwala/housekeeping staff from 06.09.2002. Mary, who had been employed since 1986 under various temporary and contingent conditions, sought regularization and the full benefits associated with her position. FCI’s resistance to this regularization was based on her age and educational qualifications, which they argued did not meet the criteria for a full-time permanent post.

Long-Term Service: The court highlighted that extracting nearly forty years of service from Mary and then denying regularization reflected poorly on the fairness and ethical considerations expected of the employer, especially a public sector entity like the FCI.

Previous Litigations and Directives: The court pointed out that prior litigations had already established the necessity of scavenging work within FCI, and various government policies and court orders had directed considerations for regularization that FCI ignored.

Qualifications and Age: The court dismissed FCI’s arguments concerning Mary’s qualifications and age, noting regulations allowed age relaxation and did not necessitate high educational qualifications for her role. The court criticized the FCI for its inaction and refusal to regularize her service despite clear directives and recommendations for such cases.

Relevant Judgements: The court referenced the Supreme Court rulings in Nihal Singh v. State of Punjab and State of Karnataka v. Umadevi, which support the regularization of employees who have long served, dismissing the argument against regularization due to a lack of sanctioned posts.

Decision: The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court’s decision for regularization. The court mandated that FCI must comply with the regularization norms to respect and uphold the rights and dignity of long-serving employees like Mary.

Date of Decision: 10th May 2024

Food Corporation of India and Others vs. Smt G Mary

Latest Legal News