Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |    

State Cannot Extract Work for Decades and Then Deny Regularization: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The main legal issue addressed in the judgement concerns the regularization of a long-serving employee who has been working under temporary and contingent conditions without official recognition or proper benefits.

Facts and Issues: The appellant, Food Corporation of India (FCI), challenged the decision of a single judge which directed the regularization of Smt G Mary’s services as Safaiwala/housekeeping staff from 06.09.2002. Mary, who had been employed since 1986 under various temporary and contingent conditions, sought regularization and the full benefits associated with her position. FCI’s resistance to this regularization was based on her age and educational qualifications, which they argued did not meet the criteria for a full-time permanent post.

Long-Term Service: The court highlighted that extracting nearly forty years of service from Mary and then denying regularization reflected poorly on the fairness and ethical considerations expected of the employer, especially a public sector entity like the FCI.

Previous Litigations and Directives: The court pointed out that prior litigations had already established the necessity of scavenging work within FCI, and various government policies and court orders had directed considerations for regularization that FCI ignored.

Qualifications and Age: The court dismissed FCI’s arguments concerning Mary’s qualifications and age, noting regulations allowed age relaxation and did not necessitate high educational qualifications for her role. The court criticized the FCI for its inaction and refusal to regularize her service despite clear directives and recommendations for such cases.

Relevant Judgements: The court referenced the Supreme Court rulings in Nihal Singh v. State of Punjab and State of Karnataka v. Umadevi, which support the regularization of employees who have long served, dismissing the argument against regularization due to a lack of sanctioned posts.

Decision: The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court’s decision for regularization. The court mandated that FCI must comply with the regularization norms to respect and uphold the rights and dignity of long-serving employees like Mary.

Date of Decision: 10th May 2024

Food Corporation of India and Others vs. Smt G Mary

Similar News