Limitation For Executing Partition Decree Not Suspended Till Engrossment; Right To Seek Engrossment Subsists During 12-Year Execution Period: Allahabad HC Unilateral Revocation Of Registered Gift Deed Through Sub-Registrar Is Void, Donor Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mediation Cannot Be Forced Upon Unwilling Party In Civil Suits; Consent Of Both Sides Essential: Bombay High Court Unmarried Daughter Not Entitled To Freedom Fighter Pension If Gainfully Employed At Time Of Father's Death: Calcutta High Court Section 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Denied For Lack Of Formal Divorce From First Marriage: Delhi High Court ONGC Cannot Demand Security From Award Holder After Giving ‘No Objection’ To Withdrawal Of Deposited Amount: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sedative Drugs Like Tramadol Impact Mental Fitness Of Declarant; Bombay High Court Acquits Man Relying On Doubtful Dying Declarations Postal Tracking Report Showing 'Refusal' Not Conclusive Proof Of Service If Denied On Oath: Delhi High Court Encroachments Near Military Installations Pose National Security Threat; Remove Illegal Constructions Within Three Months: Rajasthan High Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs State To Decide On Legality Of Charging Fees For Downloading FIRs From 'SAANJH' Portal Wife’s Educational Qualifications No Bar To Seeking Maintenance If Actual Employment Is Not Proven: Orissa High Court Mere Telephonic Contact Without Substance Of Conversation Cannot Establish Criminal Conspiracy: Madhya Pradesh High Court Serious Allegations Like HIV/AIDS Imputations Require Corroboration, Cannot Rest Solely On Unsubstantiated Testimony: Karnataka High Court Family Court Cannot Refuse Mutual Consent Divorce Merely Because Parties Are Living Separately 'Without Valid Reason': Kerala High Court Collective Attempts By Advocates To Overbear Presiding Officer Not Protected Professional Conduct: Madras High Court Dismisses Quash Petitions No Legal Evidence Required To Forward A Person To Trial? Rajasthan HC Slams Police For Implicating Accused In NDPS Case Solely On Co-Accused's Statement Accused Must Be Physically Present In Court To Furnish Bonds Under Section 91 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court

State Cannot Extract Work for Decades and Then Deny Regularization: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The main legal issue addressed in the judgement concerns the regularization of a long-serving employee who has been working under temporary and contingent conditions without official recognition or proper benefits.

Facts and Issues: The appellant, Food Corporation of India (FCI), challenged the decision of a single judge which directed the regularization of Smt G Mary’s services as Safaiwala/housekeeping staff from 06.09.2002. Mary, who had been employed since 1986 under various temporary and contingent conditions, sought regularization and the full benefits associated with her position. FCI’s resistance to this regularization was based on her age and educational qualifications, which they argued did not meet the criteria for a full-time permanent post.

Long-Term Service: The court highlighted that extracting nearly forty years of service from Mary and then denying regularization reflected poorly on the fairness and ethical considerations expected of the employer, especially a public sector entity like the FCI.

Previous Litigations and Directives: The court pointed out that prior litigations had already established the necessity of scavenging work within FCI, and various government policies and court orders had directed considerations for regularization that FCI ignored.

Qualifications and Age: The court dismissed FCI’s arguments concerning Mary’s qualifications and age, noting regulations allowed age relaxation and did not necessitate high educational qualifications for her role. The court criticized the FCI for its inaction and refusal to regularize her service despite clear directives and recommendations for such cases.

Relevant Judgements: The court referenced the Supreme Court rulings in Nihal Singh v. State of Punjab and State of Karnataka v. Umadevi, which support the regularization of employees who have long served, dismissing the argument against regularization due to a lack of sanctioned posts.

Decision: The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court’s decision for regularization. The court mandated that FCI must comply with the regularization norms to respect and uphold the rights and dignity of long-serving employees like Mary.

Date of Decision: 10th May 2024

Food Corporation of India and Others vs. Smt G Mary

Latest Legal News