High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Denies Tax Refund for Hybrid Vehicle Purchased Before Electric Vehicle Exemption Policy Entering A Room with Someone Cannot, By Any Stretch Of Imagination, Be Considered Consent For Sexual Intercourse: Bombay High Court No Specific Format Needed for Dying Declaration, Focus on Mental State and Voluntariness: Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Allows Direct Appeal Under DVAT Act Without Tribunal Reference for Pre-2005 Tax Periods NDPS | Mere Registration of Cases Does Not Override Presumption of Innocence: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Previous Antecedents and No Communal Tension: High Court Grants Bail in Caste-Based Abuse Case Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Loss of Confidence Must Be Objectively Proven to Deny Reinstatement: Kerala High Court Reinstates Workman After Flawed Domestic Enquiry Procedural lapses should not deny justice: Andhra High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Canteen Subsidy Constitutes Part of Dearness Allowance Under EPF Act: Gujarat High Court Concurrent Findings Demonstrate Credibility – Jharkhand High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheating Case 125 Cr.P.C | Financial responsibility towards dependents cannot be shirked due to personal obligations: Punjab and Haryana High Court Mere Acceptance of Money Without Proof of Demand is Not Sufficient to Establish Corruption Charges Gujrat High Court Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case

State Cannot Extract Work for Decades and Then Deny Regularization: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The main legal issue addressed in the judgement concerns the regularization of a long-serving employee who has been working under temporary and contingent conditions without official recognition or proper benefits.

Facts and Issues: The appellant, Food Corporation of India (FCI), challenged the decision of a single judge which directed the regularization of Smt G Mary’s services as Safaiwala/housekeeping staff from 06.09.2002. Mary, who had been employed since 1986 under various temporary and contingent conditions, sought regularization and the full benefits associated with her position. FCI’s resistance to this regularization was based on her age and educational qualifications, which they argued did not meet the criteria for a full-time permanent post.

Long-Term Service: The court highlighted that extracting nearly forty years of service from Mary and then denying regularization reflected poorly on the fairness and ethical considerations expected of the employer, especially a public sector entity like the FCI.

Previous Litigations and Directives: The court pointed out that prior litigations had already established the necessity of scavenging work within FCI, and various government policies and court orders had directed considerations for regularization that FCI ignored.

Qualifications and Age: The court dismissed FCI’s arguments concerning Mary’s qualifications and age, noting regulations allowed age relaxation and did not necessitate high educational qualifications for her role. The court criticized the FCI for its inaction and refusal to regularize her service despite clear directives and recommendations for such cases.

Relevant Judgements: The court referenced the Supreme Court rulings in Nihal Singh v. State of Punjab and State of Karnataka v. Umadevi, which support the regularization of employees who have long served, dismissing the argument against regularization due to a lack of sanctioned posts.

Decision: The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court’s decision for regularization. The court mandated that FCI must comply with the regularization norms to respect and uphold the rights and dignity of long-serving employees like Mary.

Date of Decision: 10th May 2024

Food Corporation of India and Others vs. Smt G Mary

Similar News