MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Special Courts Established Under Chapter XXVIII Of The Companies Act Retain Jurisdiction For IBC Offences, Not Affected By Later Legislative Changes: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the enduring jurisdiction of Special Courts to try offences under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), independent of subsequent amendments to the Companies Act. This clarification came through a judgment delivered on April 19, 2024, overturning a prior decision of the Bombay High Court.

The case emerged from the Bombay High Court's decision dated February 14, 2022, which had quashed proceedings against Satyanarayan Bankatlal Malu and others. These proceedings were initiated under the IBC due to non-compliance with a One-Time Settlement with Allahabad Bank, arguing that after the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017, a Sessions Judge's Special Court lacked the requisite jurisdiction.

The apex court pointed out that Section 236(1) of the IBC specifies that offences under the Code are to be adjudicated by the Special Courts as defined in Chapter XXVIII of the Companies Act, 2013. The Court interpreted this provision as a case of "legislation by incorporation" which means that the role of Special Courts defined at the time of the Code's enactment remains unaffected by subsequent changes to the Companies Act.

It was noted that had there been an intention to align the IBC's provisions concerning Special Courts with amendments to the Companies Act, explicit amendments to Section 236 of the IBC would have been necessary. The absence of such amendments preserves the jurisdiction as originally established.

The Supreme Court corrected the High Court's misinterpretation regarding the impact of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 on the jurisdiction of Special Courts. The judgment underscored that the original jurisdictional mandate given to Special Courts under the IBC continues to stand.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment, and reaffirmed that Special Courts as constituted at the time of the IBC's enactment have jurisdiction over IBC offences. The matter was sent back to the High Court to evaluate the original petition based on its merits.

Date of Decision: April 19, 2024.

Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India v. Satyanarayan Bankatlal Malu & Ors.

Latest Legal News