Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Simple Denial of Landlord-Tenant Relationship Insufficient to Prevent Provisional Rent Assessment: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Ejectment for Non-Payment of Rent

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that a mere denial of the landlord-tenant relationship is not enough to stop the court from assessing provisional rent. This came in the context of a landlord-tenant dispute where the tenant failed to disclose the basis of possession over the property. The decision was given by Justice Sukhvinder Kaur in the case of Lucky Malik @ Bangali vs. Akali Times Trust.

The court dealt with the issue of provisional rent assessment and subsequent ejectment of the tenant for non-payment under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act. The crux was whether a simple denial of the landlord-tenant relationship could negate the need for provisional rent assessment.

The dispute revolved around a property in Jalandhar, where the respondent Trust claimed the petitioner as their tenant since 2008, alleging non-payment of rent from July 2010. The petitioner, denying the landlord-tenant relationship, contested the trust's ownership and his liability to pay rent.

Justice Sukhvinder Kaur, in her judgment, emphasized that the trust was established as the owner of the premises based on a civil court decree dated 29.09.1980. The petitioner's possession of the property was not disputed; however, his failure to clarify the basis of possession raised questions. The court asserted, "Under the garb of denial of tenancy, the tenant cannot be allowed to enjoy the property." Reliance was placed on the Supreme Court judgment in Asha Rani Gupta Vs. Sri Vineet Kumar, underscoring the obligation to assess provisional rent in the absence of a clear disclosure of possession basis by the tenant.

The High Court dismissed the revision petitions filed by the petitioner, Lucky Malik, affirming the orders of the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority. The ejectment of the petitioner for non-payment of provisional rent was upheld, guided by the precedent set in Rakesh Wadhawan vs. M/s Jagdamba Industrial Corporation, which mandates compliance with the order of provisional rent.

Date of Decision: 13.02.2024

Lucky Malik @ Bangali vs. Akali Times Trust

Latest Legal News