Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Sale Deed Confirms Transfer of Title and Ownership – Unilateral Cancellation Deed Invalid: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India clarified the validity of a Sale Deed and its implications on the transfer of title and ownership in property disputes. The judgment in Civil Appeal No. 10412 of 2013, delivered by Hon’ble Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon’ble Justice Rajesh Bindal on July 31, 2023, sets a significant precedent in property law.

The dispute involved Yogendra Prasad Singh (deceased) and the legal representatives of the plaintiff (appellants) against Ram Bachan Devi & Ors. (respondents). The plaintiff, being the son-in-law of the first defendant, claimed ownership of the suit property through a registered Sale Deed. However, the defendants contested that the Sale Deed did not effect an absolute transfer and that the consideration was not fully paid.

The Court’s ruling, based on a thorough examination of the Sale Deed, put emphasis on its recitals. The judgment stated, “Under the Sale Deed, the entire right, title, and interest of the first defendant in the suit property has been transferred to the plaintiff.” This confirms the passing of title and possession to the plaintiff on the date of the Sale Deed, upholding the plaintiff’s ownership claim.

Furthermore, the Court deemed the unilateral cancellation deed executed by the first defendant as invalid and not binding on the plaintiff, as the latter was not a consenting party to its execution. The subsequent Gift Deed executed by the first defendant was also deemed ineffective since he had no transferable title after the Sale Deed was executed in favor of the plaintiff.

The judgment also addressed the question of unpaid consideration and its impact on the seller’s rights. It was clarified that the plaintiff’s liability to discharge the loan liabilities mentioned in the Sale Deed did not affect his ownership rights over the property.

The Supreme Court’s decision reaffirms the significance of the Sale Deed as a valid instrument for the transfer of title and ownership. The ruling protects the rights of property buyers and emphasizes the importance of comprehensive Sale Deeds in property transactions.

This judgment echoes the legal maxim “Noscitur a sociis,” which means a word is known by the company it keeps. The Court interpreted the Sale Deed in its entirety, considering all recitals to determine the true intent of the parties involved.

Date of Decision: July 31, 2023

Yogendra Prasad Singh (Dead) through LRs vs Ram Bachan Devi & Ors.                           

Latest Legal News