Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |    

Right to Receive Pension and Gratuity Are Statutory Rights Arising Out of Successful Employment Completion: Calcutta High Court Directs Immediate Release of Withheld Payments

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment addressing the statutory rights of pension and gratuity, the Calcutta High Court today directed the immediate release of withheld payments and accrued interest to a retired school headmaster, Mr. Kunal Chandra Sen. The court’s decision came after it was found that the municipal authorities unjustly withheld these dues despite the petitioner being cleared of all misconduct allegations through multiple enquiries.

The court addressed several critical legal issues surrounding administrative overreach and the right to pension and gratuity. It emphasized that pension and gratuity, being statutory rights, should not be withheld without substantial legal basis, especially when the retiree has been exonerated of all charges.

The petitioner, Kunal Chandra Sen, a retired headmaster of Chandernagore Banga Vidyalaya, faced allegations of financial misappropriation which led to the withholding of his pension and gratuity by the municipal corporation even after his retirement on July 31, 2015. Despite being cleared of all charges through subsequent investigations, the municipal authorities refused to release his dues, prompting Sen to file a writ petition (WPA 3618 of 2016) challenging the withholding of his pension and gratuity.

Invalid Enquiry by Municipal Corporation: The court noted that the Municipal Corporation constituted a Fact Finding Committee without any legal basis, as the initial state-led investigations had already exonerated the petitioner. This act was deemed beyond jurisdiction and a violation of the petitioner’s rights.

Statutory Rights to Pension and Gratuity: Justice Aniruddha Roy stressed that “the right to receive pension and gratuity are statutory rights arising out of successful completion of employment” and should be honored unless legally challenged or proven otherwise.

Municipal Overreach: The court criticized the municipal authorities for their administrative overreach and failure to adhere to the principles of natural justice by withholding the petitioner’s statutory dues without substantial grounds.

Compensation for Delay: Considering the significant delay and the wrongful withholding of payments, the court also directed compensation at an interest rate of 8% per annum from the date of the petitioner’s retirement to the date of actual payment.

The High Court ordered the immediate release of the withheld amount of Rs. 28,67,213 along with accrued interest. It further stated that should future criminal proceedings initiated by the CBI prove the petitioner’s guilt, recovery measures may be taken accordingly.

Date of Decision: May 13, 2024

Sri Kunal Chandra Sen vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Similar News