High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Denies Tax Refund for Hybrid Vehicle Purchased Before Electric Vehicle Exemption Policy Entering A Room with Someone Cannot, By Any Stretch Of Imagination, Be Considered Consent For Sexual Intercourse: Bombay High Court No Specific Format Needed for Dying Declaration, Focus on Mental State and Voluntariness: Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Allows Direct Appeal Under DVAT Act Without Tribunal Reference for Pre-2005 Tax Periods NDPS | Mere Registration of Cases Does Not Override Presumption of Innocence: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Previous Antecedents and No Communal Tension: High Court Grants Bail in Caste-Based Abuse Case Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Loss of Confidence Must Be Objectively Proven to Deny Reinstatement: Kerala High Court Reinstates Workman After Flawed Domestic Enquiry Procedural lapses should not deny justice: Andhra High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Canteen Subsidy Constitutes Part of Dearness Allowance Under EPF Act: Gujarat High Court Concurrent Findings Demonstrate Credibility – Jharkhand High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheating Case 125 Cr.P.C | Financial responsibility towards dependents cannot be shirked due to personal obligations: Punjab and Haryana High Court Mere Acceptance of Money Without Proof of Demand is Not Sufficient to Establish Corruption Charges Gujrat High Court Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case

Right to Receive Pension and Gratuity Are Statutory Rights Arising Out of Successful Employment Completion: Calcutta High Court Directs Immediate Release of Withheld Payments

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment addressing the statutory rights of pension and gratuity, the Calcutta High Court today directed the immediate release of withheld payments and accrued interest to a retired school headmaster, Mr. Kunal Chandra Sen. The court’s decision came after it was found that the municipal authorities unjustly withheld these dues despite the petitioner being cleared of all misconduct allegations through multiple enquiries.

The court addressed several critical legal issues surrounding administrative overreach and the right to pension and gratuity. It emphasized that pension and gratuity, being statutory rights, should not be withheld without substantial legal basis, especially when the retiree has been exonerated of all charges.

The petitioner, Kunal Chandra Sen, a retired headmaster of Chandernagore Banga Vidyalaya, faced allegations of financial misappropriation which led to the withholding of his pension and gratuity by the municipal corporation even after his retirement on July 31, 2015. Despite being cleared of all charges through subsequent investigations, the municipal authorities refused to release his dues, prompting Sen to file a writ petition (WPA 3618 of 2016) challenging the withholding of his pension and gratuity.

Invalid Enquiry by Municipal Corporation: The court noted that the Municipal Corporation constituted a Fact Finding Committee without any legal basis, as the initial state-led investigations had already exonerated the petitioner. This act was deemed beyond jurisdiction and a violation of the petitioner’s rights.

Statutory Rights to Pension and Gratuity: Justice Aniruddha Roy stressed that “the right to receive pension and gratuity are statutory rights arising out of successful completion of employment” and should be honored unless legally challenged or proven otherwise.

Municipal Overreach: The court criticized the municipal authorities for their administrative overreach and failure to adhere to the principles of natural justice by withholding the petitioner’s statutory dues without substantial grounds.

Compensation for Delay: Considering the significant delay and the wrongful withholding of payments, the court also directed compensation at an interest rate of 8% per annum from the date of the petitioner’s retirement to the date of actual payment.

The High Court ordered the immediate release of the withheld amount of Rs. 28,67,213 along with accrued interest. It further stated that should future criminal proceedings initiated by the CBI prove the petitioner’s guilt, recovery measures may be taken accordingly.

Date of Decision: May 13, 2024

Sri Kunal Chandra Sen vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Similar News