Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Right to Privacy Prevails: Acquits Woman allegedly Killing her Own Child: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the right to privacy and the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt have triumphed as the court acquitted a woman who had been convicted based on circumstantial evidence. Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol handed down the verdict on October 19, 2023, in a case that has far-reaching implications for the justice system.

The judgment underscores the importance of establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt when relying on circumstantial evidence. Justice Oka and Justice Karol stressed that "conviction ought to be recorded only in cases where all the links of the chain are complete, pointing only to the guilt of the accused and none else, also eliminating the element of his innocence." This sets a high standard for proving guilt in such cases.

The case revolved around the conviction of a woman under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, based primarily on the fact that she was a woman living alone and had been pregnant. However, the prosecution failed to establish any conclusive proof of a relationship between the accused and the deceased child, whose body was found under suspicious circumstances.

Justice Oka and Justice Karol emphasized that negative inferences cannot be drawn for questions or incriminating circumstances not put to the accused during their statement under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They also highlighted the delicate balance between the duty to disclose relevant information and an individual's fundamental right to privacy.

The judgment delved into the right to privacy, emphasizing that it is "the underpinning of human dignity and is fundamental to the realization of human rights." The court cited previous cases and international human rights treaties to reinforce the significance of this right.

This decision serves as a reminder that the right to privacy is inviolable and that convictions based on circumstantial evidence must meet a high standard of proof. The court's ruling has far-reaching implications for future cases involving circumstantial evidence and the right to privacy, reaffirming the principle that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Date of Decision: 19 October 2023

INDRAKUNWAR  vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH 

Latest Legal News