Possession and Part Performance: Stamp Duty Compliance Is Non-Negotiable, Says Delhi High Court Calcutta High Court Declares Disciplinary Action as ‘Shockingly Disproportionate’, Orders Reduction in Rank for Petitioner No Profits, No Deduction — Section 33AC Must Precede 80-I Calculation in Shipping Tax Disputes: Bombay High Court Equity and Merit Must Coexist: Kerala High Court Rules on Regularisation of Temporary Forest Department Employees Lawyers Have No Right to Strike: Madras High Court in Contempt Case Encroachment is like committing a 'dacoity' against public resources: Delhi High Court. High Court Rejects Plea of Kindergarten School Against ESI Contribution Assessment Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Proceedings Citing 'Humanitarian Consideration' After Accused Marries Victim Procedural Delays Do Not Justify Condonation of Delay," Rules Delhi Consumer Commission in National Insurance Case Elements of Section 300 IPC Are Not Made Out: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Murder Conviction in 1987 Beating Case Registrar Cannot Be a Judge of His Own Cause: Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes Amendments MP High Court Upholds Prosecution for Forged Patta: 'Accountability in Public Office is Non-Negotiable Approval Must Be Granted for Altruistic Kidney Donations," Rules Madras High Court Grave Illegality in Appellate Remand: High Court of Rajasthan Orders Reassessment on Merits Commissioner Lacked Authority for Retrospective Cancellation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Educational Trusts' Registrations Intent is Crucial in Violent Crimes: Single Blow with Axe Does Not Imply Attempt to Murder," Rules Madhya Pradesh High Court

Right to Make Reproductive Choices Integral to Personal Liberty – Delhi Court Affirms Reproductive Rights

05 December 2024 2:42 PM

By: sayum


Delhi High Court approves termination at 30 weeks, emphasizing the need for thorough medical evaluation and reproductive rights - In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has allowed the medical termination of a pregnancy at 30 weeks for a petitioner whose fetus was diagnosed with severe neurological abnormalities. The judgment, delivered by Justice Sanjeev Narula, underscores the importance of comprehensive medical evaluations and the reproductive rights of women. The court accepted the findings of the AIIMS Medical Board, which diagnosed the fetus with Joubert Syndrome, a condition associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes.

The petitioner, Mrs. R, a 31-year-old married woman with a nine-year-old son who suffers from a mental disability, sought medical termination of her ongoing pregnancy under Sections 3(2B) and 3(3) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. Following a series of medical examinations, including ultrasounds and a fetal MRI, doctors identified significant abnormalities indicative of Dandy Walker Continuum and later Joubert Syndrome. Initially, the Medical Board at Lok Nayak Hospital denied her request for termination due to inconclusive findings. However, a subsequent examination by a Medical Board at AIIMS provided a definitive diagnosis supporting the termination.

The court highlighted the necessity of thorough and up-to-date medical evaluations in cases involving severe fetal abnormalities. Justice Narula noted, "The Medical Board at Lok Nayak Hospital failed to provide a conclusive diagnosis due to reliance on outdated medical reports and inadequate testing. In contrast, the AIIMS Medical Board conducted comprehensive and current evaluations, arriving at a clear diagnosis of Joubert Syndrome."

The judgment reiterated the importance of considering the actual and reasonably foreseeable environment of the petitioner, in line with Section 3(3) of the MTP Act. Justice Narula emphasized, "The right to make reproductive choices is integral to the right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The decision to permit termination in this case reflects the necessity to protect the petitioner's mental health and the potential quality of life of the unborn child."

The court extensively discussed the legislative framework of the MTP Act, which allows termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks if substantial fetal abnormalities are diagnosed. Justice Narula stated, "The diagnosis of Joubert Syndrome, a multisystem disorder with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes, justifies the termination of the pregnancy despite its advanced gestational age. The findings by the AIIMS Medical Board were conclusive and aligned with established medical guidelines."

Justice Narula remarked, "The comprehensive and timely evaluation conducted by the AIIMS Medical Board has been invaluable in assisting the court in making an informed decision. Their findings, based on up-to-date medical evidence, provide a strong basis for permitting the termination."

The Delhi High Court's ruling emphasizes the critical role of medical expertise and thorough evaluations in cases involving late-term pregnancy terminations. By upholding the reproductive rights of women and considering the substantial risk of severe fetal abnormalities, the judgment sets a precedent for similar cases. This decision not only ensures the well-being of the petitioner but also underscores the judiciary's commitment to protecting women's health and reproductive choices.

Date of Decision: July 5, 2024

Similar News