SARFAESI Act | Sale Certificate Cannot Be Issued In Favour Of A Third-Party Nominee Who Was Not The Auction Bidder: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Auction Sale Conducted In Violation Of Mandatory Rules And Subsisting Restraint Order Is Vitiated In Law: Supreme Court Recovery Of Alleged Overpayment From A Separate, Unrelated Contract Without Notice Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Supreme Court IBC | Adjudicating Authority Has Power To Recall CIRP Admission Order If It Was Obtained Through Fraud Or Collusion: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Presumption Of Service Is Attracted Once Notice Is Dispatched To Correct Address Of Drawer: Supreme Court Operation Of Hookah Bars In Restaurants Constitutes Violation Of Rule 4(3) Of COTPA Rules: Allahabad High Court High Court Cannot Recall Order Passed On Merits Even If Passed Ex-Parte: Bombay High Court Administrative Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Having Civil Consequences Without Meaningful Consideration Of The Affected Employee’s Response: Allahabad High Court Discharge Application Cannot Be Converted Into A 'Mini-Trial' To Assess Evidentiary Sufficiency: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Allegations Are Falsified By Documents Annexed To Plaint Or Based On Non-Existent Law: Bombay High Court Police Cannot Interfere In Pending Civil Disputes Or Act As Arbitrators In Private Property Conflicts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Contract For Personal Services Between Doctor And Hospital Is Determinable And Not Specifically Enforceable: Calcutta High Court Allegations Of Sexual Offences Cannot Be Quashed Based On Contradictory Evidence Requiring Mini-Trial: Delhi High Court PMLA Adjudication | Failure To Expressly Discuss Every Submission In Written Synopsis Does Not Vitiate Order Under Principles Of Natural Justice: Karnataka High Court Prolonged Separation Of Sixteen Years Constitutes Cruelty Under Special Marriage Act: Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Rape Should Be Gender-Neutral Offence - Kerala HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


A woman cannot be prosecuted if she entices a man with a false promise of marriage. However, a man may be prosecuted for the same crime. It ought to be gender-neutral, remarked Justice A Muhamed Mustaque orally.When the issue of an old rape charge against the accused arose, his attorney argued that he is out on bail and that the case was built on unfounded allegations of sex under false promise to marry.

While doing so, the Court noted that, because the IPC does not contain a gender-neutral provision for rape, the court will have to consider the relative positions of the accused and the woman in terms of dominant subordinate roles.

Kerala High Court Observed that "It should be noted that the statutory provisions of the rape offence as defined in the Indian Penal Code are not gender-neutral. On the basis of a false promise to marry and have sexual relations with a man, with the man's consent obtained on the basis of such a false promise, a woman cannot be punished for rape. However, a man who falsely promises to marry a woman and then has a sexual relationship with her would be charged with rape by the prosecution. Therefore, the law creates the false assumption that the man is always in a position to dominate the woman's will. "Therefore, the understanding of consent must relate to the dominant and subordinate relationship in a sexual act.

Justice Mustaque has also advocated for the standardization of marriage and divorce laws across all religions and communities. This sentiment was eloquently expressed in a landmark decision allowing a woman to file for divorce on the basis of marital rape.

Occasionally, India's constitutional courts have been seized with petitions challenging gender exclusion in rape laws.

In 2017, the Delhi High Court issued a notice to the Central government in a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 375 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and requesting the formulation of gender-neutral rape provisions.

In 2019, the Central government defended the gender-specific rape law before the High Court, stating that the decision was made because the majority of sexual harassment victims in the country are female.

In 2018, the Criminal Justice Society of India filed a petition with the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code on the grounds that it is not gender-neutral and violates Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution because it does not account for rape of men and transgender individuals.

However, the Apex court declined to intervene.

Latest Legal News