Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Rajya Sabha Secretariat Not Governed by Section 80 CPC: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has clarified that the Rajya Sabha Secretariat is not covered by Section 80 CPC (Code of Civil Procedure), highlighting a clear distinction between the "Government" and a "public officer."

- "The Rajya Sabha Secretariat, being the permanent administrative office of the Rajya Sabha, is a separate and distinct institution from the Government, which is the Executive wing of the State."

- "The word 'Government' appearing in Section 80 CPC does not include the Rajya Sabha Secretariat."

- "Section 80 CPC has no application to the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the Rajya Sabha Secretariat, against which relief has been sought-for in the suit."

This ruling comes after a civil suit was filed against the "Rajya Sabha Secretariat Through its Secretary General," questioning the applicability of Section 80 CPC in the context of this suit.

The High Court's decision has far-reaching implications for legal matters involving the Rajya Sabha Secretariat and underscores the importance of precise interpretation of legal provisions.

Advocates and legal experts are commending the clarity brought by this judgment, which is expected to set a precedent in cases involving similar institutions.

This landmark ruling reaffirms the principle of separation of powers in the Indian Constitution and emphasizes that different entities, such as the Government and Parliament, must be treated distinctly under the law.

The Court's directive allows for the re-presentation of the plaint and the continuation of the suit without the need for compliance with Section 80 CPC, providing legal clarity and guidance for future cases involving the Rajya Sabha Secretariat.

Date of Decision: 17 October  2023

RAGHAV CHADHA   vs AJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT

Latest Legal News