-
by Admin
07 May 2024 2:49 AM
In a significant ruling on October 20, 2023, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a bail application, granted bail to the petitioner who had been languishing in custody. The judgment shed light on the alleged retaliatory nature of the FIR and raised questions about the complainant's conduct.
The judgment noted, "There appears to be an orchestrated attempt on the part of the complainant in collusion with certain officials, be it out of vengeance or otherwise, to keep filing one FIR after another to somehow keep the petitioner in custody."
The petitioner had been arrested in connection with an FIR registered under Sections 327, 323, 294, 506, 120-B, 384 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with the later addition of Section 201 IPC. The allegations against the petitioner included a conspiracy and torture by police officials.
The court observed that the petitioner's continued preventive custody was based on an unsubstantiated suspicion that he might tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. However, it pointed out, "There is no probability of tampering with evidence as it has already been seized by the investigating agency."
The judgment further highlighted that the petitioner had been in detention for over three months and that his co-accused had already been granted interim anticipatory bail.
The court concluded, "No useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further preventive custody," and ordered his release on bail.
This ruling not only provides relief to the petitioner but also raises questions about the filing of retaliatory FIRs and the need for a thorough investigation into such cases.
Date of decision: October 20, 2023
Ashish Kapoor VS State of Punjab
