Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT ACQUITS APPELLANT IN NDPS CASE: PROSECUTION FAILED TO CO-RELATE THE REPORT OF THE FSL TO THE CASE PROPERTY

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court acquitted Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case, highlighting the lack of a properly established chain of evidence. The court, in its judgment delivered by Justice Sureshwar Thakur, set aside the verdict of the trial court, which had convicted and sentenced the appellant to imprisonment and a fine.

Citing misappreciation of evidence, the appellant’s counsel, Mr. Saurav Bhatia, argued that crucial links in the chain of evidence were not adequately proven. The defense highlighted procedural lapses in the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report, where the examiner failed to re-enclose the examined substances inside sealed cloth parcels or emboss the FSL seals, raising doubts about the integrity of the case property.

Justice Sureshwar Thakur, in the judgment, observed, “The prosecution has not been able to co-relate the report of the FSL to the case property. The loose cloth parcels produced in court do not seem to be related to the examined substances.” The court emphasized the importance of maintaining an unbroken chain of evidence to establish the charges against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.

High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda of the charges. The court ordered the refund of any fines deposited by the appellant and canceled his personal and surety bonds. The fate of the case property will be determined in accordance with the law.

Date of Decision: 1st June 2023

Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda    VS State of Punjab           

Latest Legal News