Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT ACQUITS APPELLANT IN NDPS CASE: PROSECUTION FAILED TO CO-RELATE THE REPORT OF THE FSL TO THE CASE PROPERTY

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court acquitted Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case, highlighting the lack of a properly established chain of evidence. The court, in its judgment delivered by Justice Sureshwar Thakur, set aside the verdict of the trial court, which had convicted and sentenced the appellant to imprisonment and a fine.

Citing misappreciation of evidence, the appellant’s counsel, Mr. Saurav Bhatia, argued that crucial links in the chain of evidence were not adequately proven. The defense highlighted procedural lapses in the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report, where the examiner failed to re-enclose the examined substances inside sealed cloth parcels or emboss the FSL seals, raising doubts about the integrity of the case property.

Justice Sureshwar Thakur, in the judgment, observed, “The prosecution has not been able to co-relate the report of the FSL to the case property. The loose cloth parcels produced in court do not seem to be related to the examined substances.” The court emphasized the importance of maintaining an unbroken chain of evidence to establish the charges against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.

High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda of the charges. The court ordered the refund of any fines deposited by the appellant and canceled his personal and surety bonds. The fate of the case property will be determined in accordance with the law.

Date of Decision: 1st June 2023

Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda    VS State of Punjab           

Latest Legal News