MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT ACQUITS APPELLANT IN NDPS CASE: PROSECUTION FAILED TO CO-RELATE THE REPORT OF THE FSL TO THE CASE PROPERTY

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court acquitted Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case, highlighting the lack of a properly established chain of evidence. The court, in its judgment delivered by Justice Sureshwar Thakur, set aside the verdict of the trial court, which had convicted and sentenced the appellant to imprisonment and a fine.

Citing misappreciation of evidence, the appellant’s counsel, Mr. Saurav Bhatia, argued that crucial links in the chain of evidence were not adequately proven. The defense highlighted procedural lapses in the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report, where the examiner failed to re-enclose the examined substances inside sealed cloth parcels or emboss the FSL seals, raising doubts about the integrity of the case property.

Justice Sureshwar Thakur, in the judgment, observed, “The prosecution has not been able to co-relate the report of the FSL to the case property. The loose cloth parcels produced in court do not seem to be related to the examined substances.” The court emphasized the importance of maintaining an unbroken chain of evidence to establish the charges against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.

High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda of the charges. The court ordered the refund of any fines deposited by the appellant and canceled his personal and surety bonds. The fate of the case property will be determined in accordance with the law.

Date of Decision: 1st June 2023

Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda    VS State of Punjab           

Latest Legal News