Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Punjab and Haryana High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder and Kidnapping Case – No Conclusive Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court acquitted the appellant, Dinesh Kumar, who was convicted for offences under Sections 364 and 302 of the IPC (Indian Penal Code). The verdict, delivered by Hon’ble Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Hon’ble Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, sheds light on the sufficiency of evidence, contradictory testimonies, and the reliability of the recovery in the case.

The appellant had appealed against the conviction and sentence, challenging the evidence presented against him. The case revolved around the murder and kidnapping of Yashpal, a 14-year-old boy. The court’s decision was based on careful consideration of medical reports, disclosure statements, recovery memos, and the reliability of the evidence presented.

One of the key observations made by the court relates to the cause of death. The court emphasized that there was no conclusive evidence supporting a homicidal cause of death. The medical reports revealed mild congestion in the lungs, suggesting a natural cause of death, possibly due to a lung infection.

The court also raised doubts about the authenticity of the recovery of the deceased’s mobile phone and the purported extortionate messages sent from it. The messages exchanged lacked dates and circumstances, and the recovery of the mobile phone was questionable, as it was registered under a different name. The court noted that there was insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

“Insufficient evidence to establish appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt – Lack of credible evidence suggesting a homicidal cause of death – Doubts raised about authenticity of recovery and messages – Appeal allowed, appellant acquitted of charges,” the court concluded.

The judgement emphasizes the importance of credible evidence in establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and highlights the need for caution in cases involving serious offences. This verdict underscores the critical role of evidence in criminal cases and reaffirms the principles of justice and due process.

The appellant’s acquittal in this case highlights the significance of thorough examination of evidence and the necessity of a high standard of proof in criminal proceedings. This landmark judgement sets a precedent for similar cases, highlighting the necessity for conclusive and credible evidence before determining guilt in criminal matters.

Date of Decision: 01.8.2023

Dinesh Kumar vs State of Haryana

Latest Legal News