Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder and Kidnapping Case – No Conclusive Evidence

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court acquitted the appellant, Dinesh Kumar, who was convicted for offences under Sections 364 and 302 of the IPC (Indian Penal Code). The verdict, delivered by Hon’ble Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Hon’ble Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, sheds light on the sufficiency of evidence, contradictory testimonies, and the reliability of the recovery in the case.

The appellant had appealed against the conviction and sentence, challenging the evidence presented against him. The case revolved around the murder and kidnapping of Yashpal, a 14-year-old boy. The court’s decision was based on careful consideration of medical reports, disclosure statements, recovery memos, and the reliability of the evidence presented.

One of the key observations made by the court relates to the cause of death. The court emphasized that there was no conclusive evidence supporting a homicidal cause of death. The medical reports revealed mild congestion in the lungs, suggesting a natural cause of death, possibly due to a lung infection.

The court also raised doubts about the authenticity of the recovery of the deceased’s mobile phone and the purported extortionate messages sent from it. The messages exchanged lacked dates and circumstances, and the recovery of the mobile phone was questionable, as it was registered under a different name. The court noted that there was insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

“Insufficient evidence to establish appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt – Lack of credible evidence suggesting a homicidal cause of death – Doubts raised about authenticity of recovery and messages – Appeal allowed, appellant acquitted of charges,” the court concluded.

The judgement emphasizes the importance of credible evidence in establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and highlights the need for caution in cases involving serious offences. This verdict underscores the critical role of evidence in criminal cases and reaffirms the principles of justice and due process.

The appellant’s acquittal in this case highlights the significance of thorough examination of evidence and the necessity of a high standard of proof in criminal proceedings. This landmark judgement sets a precedent for similar cases, highlighting the necessity for conclusive and credible evidence before determining guilt in criminal matters.

Date of Decision: 01.8.2023

Dinesh Kumar vs State of Haryana

Latest Legal News