Dowry Case | In the absence of specific allegations, mere naming of distant relatives cannot justify prosecution: MP High Court Non-Commencement of Activities Alone Not a Ground for Refusal: Calcutta High Court at Calcutta Affirms Trust Registration, Stating Granting Shifting Permissions is a Quasi-Judicial Act: Delhi High Court Quashes Disciplinary Charges Against MCA Official Jurisdiction Does Not Preclude Transfer to Competent Family Courts: Rules Kerala High Court Madras High Court Acquits Two, Reduces Sentence of Main Accused: Single Injury Does Not Prove Intent to Murder Financial Creditors Retain Right to Pursue Personal Guarantors Post-Resolution Plan: Punjab & Haryana High Court Proper Notice and Enquiry are the Bedrock of Just Administrative Actions: Rajasthan High Court Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Discharge Order in Madan Tamang Murder Case, Orders Trial for Bimal Gurung Review Cannot be Treated Like an Appeal in Disguise: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Tax Review Petition Delhi High Court Orders Interest Payment on Delayed Tax Refunds: ‘Refund Delays Cannot Be Justified by Legal Issues’” Freedom of Press Does Not Exempt Legal Consequences: Kerala High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Journalists in Jail Sting Operation Highest Bidder Has No Vested Right”: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Rejection of SEZ Plot Allotment Indefeasible Right to Bail Arises When Investigation Exceeds Statutory Period: Punjab & Haryana HC Sets Aside Extension Orders in NDPS Case Higher Qualifications Can't Override Prescribed Standards, But Service Deserves Pension: Punjab & Haryana High Court A Mere Breach of Promise Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 406 IPC: Rajasthan High Court Madras High Court Overturns Order Denying IDA Increments, Citing Unfair Settlement Exclusion No Premeditated Intention to Kill: Kerala High Court Reduces Murder Convictions in Football Clash Case Landlord Need Not Be Owner to Seek Eviction: Court Upholds Broad Definition of Landlord under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 Delhi High Court Sets Aside Status Quo on Property, Initiates Contempt Proceedings for False Pleadings and Suppression of Facts Calcutta High Court Rules Deceased Driver Qualifies as Third Party, Overrides Policy Limitations for Just Compensation A Litigant Who Pollutes the Stream of Justice Is Not Entitled to Any Relief: Rajasthan High Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case Due to Suppression of Evidence Punjab and Haryana High Court Awards Compensation in Illegal Termination Case, Affirms Forest Department as an 'Industry' Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof: Madras High Court Acquits Man in Double Murder Case Kerala High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Loan Repayment Dispute: Manifestly Attended with Mala Fide Intentions Systematic Instruction Essential for ‘Education’ Tax Exemption: Delhi High Court Intent to Deceive Constitutes Forgery: High Court of Calcutta Dismisses Quashing Petition in Fraudulent Property Inclusion Case

Promotional Trailers Do Not Transform Into Promises or Agreements Enforceable by Law: Supreme Cour

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India delves into the legal nature of promotional trailers, examining whether they create contractual obligations or constitute unfair trade practices when their content is not included in the final movie.

Facts and Issues: The appellant, Yash Raj Films, used a promotional trailer featuring a song to advertise the movie “Fan.” The respondent, motivated by the trailer, watched the film expecting to see the song included. When the song was not featured in the movie, she filed a consumer complaint alleging deficiency of service and unfair trade practice. The complaint was dismissed at the district level but was subsequently upheld by the State and National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions, leading to this appeal.

Contractual Obligations: The Court emphasized that promotional trailers are unilateral communications that do not constitute legal offers or form contracts. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha stated, “Promotional trailers are unilateral and do not qualify as offers eliciting acceptance, and as such they do not transform into promises, much less agreements enforceable by law.”

Unfair Trade Practice: Regarding the claim of unfair trade practice, the Court found that the promotional trailer did not misleadingly promise the inclusion of the song in the movie. The judgment clarified, “The facts do not support a finding of unfair trade practice under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.”

Freedom of Artistic Expression: The judgment also recognized the inherent artistic freedom in film production, noting that decisions on content inclusion are at the discretion of filmmakers and should be considered in evaluating allegations of deceptive marketing practices.

Decision: The Supreme Court overturned the lower courts’ decisions, ruling that the promotional trailer did not create a contractual obligation and its content not appearing in the final film did not amount to an unfair trade practice. The appeal by Yash Raj Films was allowed.

Date of Decision: 22nd April 2024

YASH RAJ FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs AFREEN FATIMA ZAIDI & ANR.

 

Similar News