Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Promotion Eligibility of Kerala Water Authority Engineers: Diploma Promotees Cannot Switch to Degree Quota: Kerala HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has clarified the rules surrounding the promotion eligibility of Assistant Engineers in the Kerala Water Authority (KWA). Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V, presiding over the case, ruled that engineers promoted through the Diploma quota cannot subsequently switch to the Degree quota for further promotions.

The court was dealing with a dispute regarding the seniority and promotion of Assistant Engineers who entered service through different quotas. The key legal issue was whether engineers promoted from the Diploma quota could be included in the seniority list for Degree quota promotions. The judgment explicitly states, “the action of including respondents 4 to 10 in Ext.P12 final seniority list of directly recruited Assistant Engineers is clearly illegal.”

Justice Vijayaraghavan observed, “Assistant Engineers are appointed through two primary methods: direct recruitment from the open market and internal recruitment of candidates holding an Engineering Degree, as well as promotion from Draftsman Grade 1 positions for those with an Engineering Diploma.” This distinction, as per the Court, necessitates maintaining separate seniority lists for each category.

The judgment extensively referred to the Kerala Public Health Engineering Subordinate Service Special Rules and the Kerala Public Health Engineering Service Special Rules. These rules stipulate the service conditions of employees and form the basis of the court’s decision.

The Court further quoted from its judgment, “Respondents 4 to 10, while serving as Overseers in the KWA, responded to a PSC notification and were included in the Ext.P8 rank list for direct recruitment. However, they opted not to pursue direct recruitment as Assistant Engineers, presumably due to the advantages and benefits that such a course offered to them.”

This ruling has significant implications for the promotion policies within the Kerala Water Authority. It clarifies that the path of promotion for engineers is determined by the quota through which they initially entered service, whether by direct recruitment or through promotion from the Diploma quota.

Date of Decision: 22nd November 2023

Sajithabai and Others VS Kerala Water Authority and Others

Latest Legal News