Subsequent Declaration Of Juvenility Does Not Vitiate Conviction On Merits: Supreme Court Borrowers Cannot Ignore Bank Accounting Systems And Suspense Accounts To Claim Arbitrary Reductions In Loan Dues: Supreme Court Re-employed Judicial Officers Cannot Claim 6th Pay Commission Scales: Supreme Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Erroneously Exercising Review Jurisdiction On 'Mistaken Notion', Restores Employee's ACP Benefits Trademark Infringement: Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff On Use Of Brand Name Even If Written Statement Is Not On Record: Supreme Court 'Interest And Welfare Of Child Would Be Best Served': Supreme Court Invokes Parens Patriae In Contempt Plea; Revokes Own Custody Order Mere Absence From MCA Records Cannot Absolve Accused Under Section 138 NI Act If Prima Facie Role Is Shown: Punjab & Haryana High Court Incomplete Or Defective Real Estate Application Cannot Claim Deemed Registration Under Section 5(2) Of RERA Act: Orissa High Court Mere Criminal Antecedents Cannot Justify Invoking 'Organized Crime' Offence Under Section 111 BNS Without Fulfilling Statutory Ingredients: Madhya Pradesh High Court 'Testator's Character & Prior Gifts Justify Unequal Distribution': Madras High Court Upholds Holographic Will Minority Status Cannot Arrest Limitation Period For Appeal If Minor Was Represented By Natural Guardian In Original Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Admission Of Property Boundaries In Family Partition Deeds Destroys Coparceners' Claim That Land Remains Joint Ancestral Property: Karnataka High Court Mesne Profits Must Reflect Open Market Letting Value Rather Than Static Contractual Rates: Delhi High Court Law Graduates Who Fail To Clear AIBE Within Two Years Cannot Practice In Any Court, Tribunal Or Revenue Authority: Allahabad High Court Bombay High Court Slams 'Growing Tendency' To Bypass GST Appeals, Says 'Natural Justice' Not A Blanket Excuse For Writ Petitions Proportionate Cost Only Can Be Awarded On Decreed Amount, Not On Total Plaint Valuation: Kerala High Court

Private Agreements Cannot Dictate Public Policy: Supreme Court Upholds SRA's Authority in Slum Rehabilitation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India upheld the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Sayunkta Sangarsh Samiti & Anr. vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors., emphasizing the statutory authority of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) in the allotment process under slum rehabilitation schemes.

The appellants had challenged the High Court's dismissal of their writ petition, which contested the SRA's allotment methods in the redevelopment of slums in Mumbai’s Lower Parel Division. The primary contention revolved around an MoU between a minority group of slum dwellers and a developer, which was not in line with the standard procedures of the SRA.

In their ruling, the Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Aniruddha Bose and Sudhanshu Dhulia stated, "Private agreements cannot be enforced in Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as against the statutory mandate of the SRA." This observation highlights the court’s stance that individual or private agreements cannot override public policy and legal statutes, particularly in matters concerning welfare and redevelopment.

The judgment further reinforced the legal provisions for allotment under the Development Control Regulations (DCR) 1991 and Circular No. 162, dated 23.10.2015, mandating a lottery system for the allotment of rehabilitation tenements. The court emphasized the need for fairness and compliance with legal norms in the allotment process.

The apex court dismissed the appeal and upheld the High Court's decision, directing the SRA to carry out the allotment of flats in accordance with the law. It also vacated the order of status quo on the allotment of flats granted earlier by the court.

This decision is a significant affirmation of the statutory powers of the SRA and serves as a precedent in ensuring that slum redevelopment schemes are carried out in accordance with established legal procedures, safeguarding the rights and interests of slum dwellers. The court's ruling also serves as a caution against attempts to bypass statutory procedures, emphasizing the role of legal norms over private arrangements in public welfare projects.

Date of Decision: 15th December 2023

Sayunkta Sangarsh Samiti & Anr.  VS State of Maharashtra & Ors. 

 

Latest Legal News