Accused Loses Right To Default Bail By Acquiescence If Extension Orders Are Challenged Only After Chargesheet Filing: Supreme Court AP High Court Orders Release Of Vehicle Seized For Mineral Transport Violations Upon Payment Of Penalty, Says Rules Don't Mandate Indefinite Detention Short Time Gap Between 'Last Seen' And Death Clinches Murder Conviction Against Fired Driver: Allahabad High Court Court Must Restore Possession To Dispossessed Party If Ex-Parte Decree Is Set Aside Even If Property Descriptions Differ: Andhra Pradesh High Court Management Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointment Citing Delay If It Failed To Maintain Service Records: Calcutta High Court Long Possession Alone Does Not Establish Tenancy; Burden Of Proof Lies On Person Claiming Status Of Tenant: Bombay High Court Consent Of Minor Immaterial: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction But Acquits Man Of Kidnapping Charges Notional Income Of Minor In Motor Accident Claims Must Be Based On Minimum Wages Of Skilled Workmen: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹56.8 Lakhs Revenue Records Serve Only Fiscal Purpose, Cannot Be Treated As Proof Of Title To Property: Supreme Court Executing Court Cannot Grant 'Deemed Extension' Of Time For Deposit In Specific Performance Decree: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Not Deposited Within Stipulated Time: Supreme Court Supreme Court Protects MSMEs From Closure Over Missing Environmental Clearance If Pollution Boards Were Unaware Of Requirement Industrial Units Operating With Valid PCB Consents Can't Be Closed Merely For Technical Want Of Prior Environmental Clearance: Supreme Court Punishment On Charge Not Framed In Show Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Supreme Court Reduces Doctor's Penalty To Censure Plea Of Acquiescence Cannot Defeat Lawful Title Claim When Encroachment Is Established: Madras High Court Board Of Revenue Can't Quash Unchallenged Orders While Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction: Orissa High Court Penetration To Any Extent Sufficient For Offence Under POCSO Act; Intact Hymen No Bar For Conviction: Meghalaya High Court Expeditious Conclusion Of Summary Force Court Trial Not Arbitrary If Procedure Followed; ITBPF Act Self-Contained: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Doesn't Bar Appeal Filed Prior To Withdrawal Of Earlier Defective Appeal Against Same Order: Madhya Pradesh High Court Appointment Of Receiver Is An 'Extreme Remedy', Cannot Be Ordered Lightly Especially After Decades Of Inaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Prioritizing The Child’s Well-Being Over Other Considerations In Custody Battles: Supreme Court Upholds Father’s Custody In Child Custody Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the custody of a child with the father, emphasizing the paramount importance of the child’s welfare in custody disputes. The decision in the case of Selvaraj vs. Revathi was delivered by Justices Vikram Nath and Rajesh Bindal.

The apex court, in its judgment, highlighted, “In any matter of custody of a child, his welfare is paramount consideration.” This observation underscores the court’s approach in prioritizing the child’s well-being over other considerations in custody battles.

The custody dispute emerged after a matrimonial discord between Selvaraj and Revathi, leading to divorce proceedings. The child, born out of their wedlock, had been living with the father since birth. Despite a previous order directing the father to hand over custody to the mother, compliance was not met.

The court interacted directly with the child, who expressed a strong preference to stay with the father. The court noted, “From the very beginning, he is living with the father-appellant... It would not be in the interest for upbringing of the child that his custody is given to the respondent-mother at this stage.”

Senior Advocate Ms. V. Mohana was appointed to counsel and interact with the child and parents. Her efforts led to the child agreeing to monthly meetings and phone calls with the mother, fostering a gradual improvement in their relationship.

Maintaining the status quo, the Supreme Court ruled that the child’s custody would remain with the father, Selvaraj, while granting the mother, Revathi, rights to call and have monthly visits. The court’s decision is reflective of its consideration of the child’s preferences and psychological well-being.

Date of Decision: 6th December 2023

SELVARAJ VS REVATHI

Latest Legal News