Wife Exaggerating Husband's Income In Maintenance Affidavit Is Not Perjury: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Husband's Section 340 Application Candidate Cannot Be Faulted For Missing Disclaimers In Form-26 Supplied By Returning Officer: Bombay High Court Dismissal Without Departmental Enquiry Violates Natural Justice When Criminal Conviction Is Set Aside: Chhattisgarh High Court Orders Reinstatement Cipla MD Gets Relief: Himachal Pradesh HC Quashes Drug Prosecution For Absence of Specific Averment on Day-to-Day Role Mandatory Notice Under Section 106(3) Railways Act Applies To 'Overcharges', Not 'Illegal Charges': Gauhati High Court Insurer Can't Escape Paying Accident Victims Even With Invalid Licence Defence — Avoidance Clause In Policy Seals Liability: Gujarat High Court Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts — Once A Claim Is Founded On Fraud, The Entire Edifice Of The Claim Collapses And No Relief Can Be Granted: Supreme Court Like Cases Must Be Decided Alike": Orissa High Court Directs State To Pay Service Benefits To Deceased Employee's Heirs Claiming Parity Ancient Jain Idol Cannot Remain In Police Custody Under Treasure Trove Act: Allahabad High Court Orders Transfer To Museum Income Tax | Receivables For Warranty Reimbursements Constitute An 'Asset' Under Section 153A For Reopening Assessment: Delhi High Court Married Persons Cannot Claim Police Protection For Live-In Relationships Without First Obtaining Divorce: Allahabad High Court Breach Of Private Compromise Cannot Ipso Facto Trigger Cancellation Of Probation Granted On Legally Sustainable Grounds: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Interference Under Article 226 In Eviction Proceedings When Land Compensation Is Deposited In Competent Court: Kerala High Court "Immediately Preceding Three Years" For Land Compensation Must Be Calculated From Date Of Section 11 Notification, Not Calendar Year: Jharkhand High Court Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Attributed To Minor Children; State Strictly Liable For Unsecured Hazardous Reservoirs: J&K High Court Party Seeking Transfer Can't Hide Pending Transfer Petition From High Court: Karnataka HC Quashes Transfer Order Mother Can Represent Muslim Minor As 'Next Friend' In Civil Suit As CPC Provisions Are Secular And Not Tied To Personal Law: Calcutta High Court First Appellate Court Must Frame Points For Determination Under Order XLI Rule 31 CPC, Cannot Remand Cryptically: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Recovery Of Stolen Property Cannot Be Sole Basis For Murder Conviction If Chain Of Circumstances Is Broken: Bombay High Court MP Constable's Shell Company, Rs.6.44 Crore Properties, Ghost Cooperative Society: HC Rejects PMLA Bail of Director Who Had 'No Financial Capability' To Buy What He Bought

Prima Facie Evidence of a Loving Relationship: High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent legal development, the High Court of Karnataka has granted bail to the petitioner accused in a case involving a mix of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act offences. The decision comes after a detailed examination of the case, and the court cited “prima facie evidence of a loving relationship” between the accused and the victim.

The case in question, Special Criminal Pocso No. 114 of 2023, pertains to an incident registered by the Chitradurga Women Police Station, Chitradurga District, under Sections 363, 376(2)(n) of IPC, Sections 4, 5(J)(II), 5(L), 6, 17 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 9, 10, and 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The accused, identified as Sri. G. Venu, had sought regular bail after his earlier application was rejected.

The court, presided over by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice S Vishwajith Shetty, heard arguments from both sides. The complainant, who is the mother of the victim girl, had lodged the complaint in July 2023. During the investigation, the petitioner and the victim girl were located, and the petitioner was remanded to judicial custody. The victim girl’s statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which forms a crucial part of the evidence in this case.

The petitioner’s counsel argued that the evidence on record indicated a loving relationship between the petitioner and the victim girl, and it was at the victim’s insistence that the petitioner had taken her to his relative’s house. The victim girl had not made any serious allegations against the petitioner, further supporting the petitioner’s plea for bail.

In response, the High Court Government Pleader opposed the bail application, while the complainant remained absent during the hearing.

Justice S Vishwajith Shetty, in his observation, noted, “The material on record would go to show that the victim girl has not made any serious allegations against the petitioner. On the other hand, she has stated that after she attains 18 years of age, she intends to marry the petitioner.”

The judge also highlighted that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and had been in custody since July 27, 2023. With the investigation completed and the charge sheet filed, the court found that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case for the grant of regular bail.

As a result, the court ordered, “The Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in Spl.C.Pocso No.114 of 2023 pending before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, subject to certain conditions, including execution of a personal bond.”

Date of Decision: 4th December 2023

SRI. G. VENU VS STATE BY CHITRADURGA WOMEN POLICE STATION

Latest Legal News