Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Prima Facie Evidence of a Loving Relationship: High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent legal development, the High Court of Karnataka has granted bail to the petitioner accused in a case involving a mix of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act offences. The decision comes after a detailed examination of the case, and the court cited “prima facie evidence of a loving relationship” between the accused and the victim.

The case in question, Special Criminal Pocso No. 114 of 2023, pertains to an incident registered by the Chitradurga Women Police Station, Chitradurga District, under Sections 363, 376(2)(n) of IPC, Sections 4, 5(J)(II), 5(L), 6, 17 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 9, 10, and 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The accused, identified as Sri. G. Venu, had sought regular bail after his earlier application was rejected.

The court, presided over by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice S Vishwajith Shetty, heard arguments from both sides. The complainant, who is the mother of the victim girl, had lodged the complaint in July 2023. During the investigation, the petitioner and the victim girl were located, and the petitioner was remanded to judicial custody. The victim girl’s statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which forms a crucial part of the evidence in this case.

The petitioner’s counsel argued that the evidence on record indicated a loving relationship between the petitioner and the victim girl, and it was at the victim’s insistence that the petitioner had taken her to his relative’s house. The victim girl had not made any serious allegations against the petitioner, further supporting the petitioner’s plea for bail.

In response, the High Court Government Pleader opposed the bail application, while the complainant remained absent during the hearing.

Justice S Vishwajith Shetty, in his observation, noted, “The material on record would go to show that the victim girl has not made any serious allegations against the petitioner. On the other hand, she has stated that after she attains 18 years of age, she intends to marry the petitioner.”

The judge also highlighted that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and had been in custody since July 27, 2023. With the investigation completed and the charge sheet filed, the court found that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case for the grant of regular bail.

As a result, the court ordered, “The Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in Spl.C.Pocso No.114 of 2023 pending before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, subject to certain conditions, including execution of a personal bond.”

Date of Decision: 4th December 2023

SRI. G. VENU VS STATE BY CHITRADURGA WOMEN POLICE STATION

Latest Legal News