-
by sayum
10 June 2026 2:36 PM
In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court, on November 28, upheld the acquittal of two individuals accused in a high-profile robbery case. The bench, comprising The Hon'ble Dr. Justice H.B. Prabhakara Sastry and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil B Katti, dismissed the appeal filed by the State against the acquittal verdict initially delivered by the trial court.
The case, Criminal Appeal No. 565 of 2017 (A), revolved around allegations of carjacking and theft of cash, a gold chain, and a mobile phone. The trial court had earlier acquitted the accused, citing a lack of substantial evidence to prove their involvement in the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
In its decision, the High Court emphasized the principle of the presumption of innocence, especially in cases of acquittal. Quoting a key observation, the Court stated, "Presumption of innocence of the accused is reinforced by an order of acquittal." This principle formed a critical aspect of their judgment, aligning with the established jurisprudence that favors the accused in scenarios of acquittal.
The prosecution's appeal challenged the trial court's judgment, asserting errors in evaluating the evidence and the identification process of the accused. However, the High Court, after careful examination, found no substantial reason to interfere with the trial court's decision. The discrepancies in the recovery of stolen items and the identification of the accused played a significant role in shaping the Court's verdict.
The case was further notable for its reference to several landmark Supreme Court judgments, underscoring the appellate court's role in cases of acquittal and the reinforced presumption of innocence.
Date of Decision: 28 November 2023
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS VENUGOPAL @ VENU and Others
