Motor Insurance Policy Covers Cross-Border Travel If Specifically Authorized By Valid Permit Under MVA: Supreme Court Petrol Pumps Act As 'Commission Agents' For Mahanagar Gas, Liable To Pay Service Tax Under Business Auxiliary Service: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Dilute 'Bangalore Water Supply' Ratio, Affirms Worker Protection Remains The Core Of Industrial Disputes Act Order XXII Rule 9(3) CPC | Application Under Section 5 Limitation Act Must Be Filed Separately To Condonate Delay In Setting Aside Abatement: Supreme Court Principle Of Parity | Supreme Court Extends Benefit Of Fixed-Term Sentence To Co-Accused Based On Remission Period Right To Catch Fish Amounts To 'Profit à Prendre' And Is Compulsorily Registrable As A Lease Under Section 17(1)(d) Registration Act: Supreme Court Supreme Court Mandates Adoption Of Guidelines To Inculcate Sensitivity And Compassion In Judicial Processes For Sexual Offences 'Last Seen' Circumstance Is Weak Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused PSEB | Pre-Regularization Service Must Be Counted As Qualifying Service For Pensionary Benefits: Supreme Court Writ Of Quo Warranto Cannot Be Used For Redress Of Personal Grievances By Unsuccessful Candidates In Selection Process: Supreme Court 'Case Of No Investigation': Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Citing 'Shoddy' Police Work And Lack Of Forensic Evidence 'Status Quo Cannot Be Vacated Without Appropriate Security': Supreme Court Directs Additional ₹200 Crores Deposit In RAKIA-Matrix Case SARFAESI Act | 'Bank' As Assignee Can Invoke Recovery Measures Even If Debt Was Originally Created By Non-Notified Financial Institution: Supreme Court 'CBI Failed Miserably': Supreme Court Tears Into 'Fabricated' Case, Acquits Bank Manager In 35-Year-Old Corruption Trial Mere Delay In Tax Deposit Cannot Be Equated With Non-Payment: Supreme Court Quashes Penalty On Saudi Arabian Airlines Revisional Power Under Section 56 Karnataka Land Revenue Act Cannot Be Invoked Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period: Supreme Court Prosecution Can’t Use Known Locations To Create 'Discovery' Fiction: Supreme Court Rejects Site Plan As Evidence Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage And Long-Term Separation Constitute Valid Grounds For Divorce Under Section 13(1)(ib) HMA: Supreme Court 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Is A Guideline And Not A Fetish': Supreme Court Acquits Man In 2007 Murder Case Over Fragile Circumstantial Evidence Plea Of Juvenility Is A Jurisdictional Fact; High Court Must Recall Final Judgments Under Section 482 CrPC To Remedy Miscarriage Of Justice: Supreme Court SEBI | Professional Clearing Members Have No Statutory Obligation To Verify Credit/Debit Positions Of Individual Clients Of Trading Members: Supreme Court

Possession Of Parties as On The Date Of The Suit To Be Considered While Granting Temporary Injunction - Telangana High Court

05 September 2024 5:25 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered by Justice P. Madhavi Devi of the Telangana High Court, a significant development in a land ownership dispute was observed. The case, C.R.P. No. 1291 of 2023, involved a dispute over the possession of agricultural land in Kondamadugu Village, Yadadri Bhongir District.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the plaintiffs, who claimed to be the owners and possessors of the land in question, against the defendants. The plaintiffs sought a declaration of title and permanent injunction against the defendants, alleging interference with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land.

The High Court, in its judgment, made several noteworthy observations. It emphasized that in a suit for injunction, the possession of the parties as of the date of the suit should be the primary consideration. The court also pointed out that discrepancies in earlier years' revenue records should not overshadow the current possession status.

Justice P. Madhavi Devi stated, "The Lower Courts have not considered the issue in the proper perspective and have relied upon irrelevant documents to deny the relief of injunction to the plaintiffs."

High Court set aside the orders of the lower courts and allowed the plaintiffs' application for an interim injunction. The court directed the lower court to consider all relevant documents when disposing of the suit.

Date Of Decision: 29 August 2023

Kadem Sathaiah  vs Mandala Ravindar Reddy 

Latest Legal News