MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Possession Of Parties as On The Date Of The Suit To Be Considered While Granting Temporary Injunction - Telangana High Court

05 September 2024 5:25 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered by Justice P. Madhavi Devi of the Telangana High Court, a significant development in a land ownership dispute was observed. The case, C.R.P. No. 1291 of 2023, involved a dispute over the possession of agricultural land in Kondamadugu Village, Yadadri Bhongir District.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the plaintiffs, who claimed to be the owners and possessors of the land in question, against the defendants. The plaintiffs sought a declaration of title and permanent injunction against the defendants, alleging interference with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land.

The High Court, in its judgment, made several noteworthy observations. It emphasized that in a suit for injunction, the possession of the parties as of the date of the suit should be the primary consideration. The court also pointed out that discrepancies in earlier years' revenue records should not overshadow the current possession status.

Justice P. Madhavi Devi stated, "The Lower Courts have not considered the issue in the proper perspective and have relied upon irrelevant documents to deny the relief of injunction to the plaintiffs."

High Court set aside the orders of the lower courts and allowed the plaintiffs' application for an interim injunction. The court directed the lower court to consider all relevant documents when disposing of the suit.

Date Of Decision: 29 August 2023

Kadem Sathaiah  vs Mandala Ravindar Reddy 

Latest Legal News