TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Police Cannot be Allowed to Tutor Prosecution Witnesses – Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Manikandan v. State By the Inspector of Police delved into the misconduct of police in tutoring witnesses, resulting in the overturning of the murder conviction against the appellants. The judgment is significant for its scrutiny of the police’s role in influencing eyewitness testimony and safeguarding the integrity of judicial processes.

The crux of the case involved the conviction of Manikandan (Accused No.2) in a murder case based on the testimony of witnesses related to the deceased, Balamurugan. The defense highlighted discrepancies in the witnesses’ accounts and accused the police of tutoring them, while also questioning the non-examination of independent witnesses.

Tutoring of Witnesses: The Court observed egregious misconduct by the police, who had “taught” the prosecution witnesses how to give evidence. This act was labeled as a severe misuse of authority and interference with the judicial process.

Integrity of Eyewitness Accounts: Due to police intervention, the Court dismissed the testimonies of the tutored witnesses, citing doubts about their reliability.

Exclusion of Independent Testimonies: The failure of the prosecution to examine independent eyewitnesses led the Court to infer negatively against the case presented.

Allocation of Doubt: Given the substantial uncertainty cast on the prosecution’s narrative, the appellants were granted the benefit of doubt.

Consideration of Time Served: The Court noted the appellants had already served more than ten years in incarceration before being released on bail.

Decision: The Supreme Court’s decision acquitted the appellants of all charges, emphasizing the significant role of law enforcement in upholding the integrity of the criminal justice system. The judgment also mandated an inquiry into the conduct of the police officers involved and called for appropriate action against those found guilty of misconduct.

Date of Decision: April 5, 2024

Manikandan v. State By the Inspector of Police

Latest Legal News