Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Police Cannot be Allowed to Tutor Prosecution Witnesses – Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Manikandan v. State By the Inspector of Police delved into the misconduct of police in tutoring witnesses, resulting in the overturning of the murder conviction against the appellants. The judgment is significant for its scrutiny of the police’s role in influencing eyewitness testimony and safeguarding the integrity of judicial processes.

The crux of the case involved the conviction of Manikandan (Accused No.2) in a murder case based on the testimony of witnesses related to the deceased, Balamurugan. The defense highlighted discrepancies in the witnesses’ accounts and accused the police of tutoring them, while also questioning the non-examination of independent witnesses.

Tutoring of Witnesses: The Court observed egregious misconduct by the police, who had “taught” the prosecution witnesses how to give evidence. This act was labeled as a severe misuse of authority and interference with the judicial process.

Integrity of Eyewitness Accounts: Due to police intervention, the Court dismissed the testimonies of the tutored witnesses, citing doubts about their reliability.

Exclusion of Independent Testimonies: The failure of the prosecution to examine independent eyewitnesses led the Court to infer negatively against the case presented.

Allocation of Doubt: Given the substantial uncertainty cast on the prosecution’s narrative, the appellants were granted the benefit of doubt.

Consideration of Time Served: The Court noted the appellants had already served more than ten years in incarceration before being released on bail.

Decision: The Supreme Court’s decision acquitted the appellants of all charges, emphasizing the significant role of law enforcement in upholding the integrity of the criminal justice system. The judgment also mandated an inquiry into the conduct of the police officers involved and called for appropriate action against those found guilty of misconduct.

Date of Decision: April 5, 2024

Manikandan v. State By the Inspector of Police

Latest Legal News