At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

P&H High Court Upholds Extension of Investigation Time and Denial of Default Bail in Narcotics Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, 7th July 2023 - In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the extension of investigation time and the denial of default bail in a narcotics case. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, addressed two petitions arising from the same proceedings related to an FIR registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).

The petitioners had challenged the order extending the time for presenting the final report under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) and the rejection of their default bail applications filed under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Justice Deepak Gupta, in the judgment, emphasized the importance of the Public Prosecutor independently applying his mind and submitting a report indicating the progress of the investigation and compelling reasons for seeking detention beyond 180 days. The court noted that the Public Prosecutor had fulfilled these requirements and had served notice to the accused.

The court further examined the non-receipt of the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report as a compelling reason for the extension. It held that the investigating agency had made efforts to obtain the report within the prescribed time and the non-receipt of the report was beyond their control. Therefore, the court found the extension of time justified.

"The investigating agency cannot be faulted for not filing the challan due to non-completion of investigation for want of FSL report. Once all the necessary steps had been taken by the investigating agency, it was certainly a compelling reason for them for not filing the challan within 180 days," stated Justice Deepak Gupta in the judgment.

Consequently, the court upheld the order extending the time for investigation and the denial of default bail, stating that the petitioners were rightly declined default bail as the time for investigation had been extended.

Date of Decision: 07.07.2023

Amit vs State of Haryana

Latest Legal News