Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

P&H High Court Upholds Extension of Investigation Time and Denial of Default Bail in Narcotics Case

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, 7th July 2023 - In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the extension of investigation time and the denial of default bail in a narcotics case. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, addressed two petitions arising from the same proceedings related to an FIR registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).

The petitioners had challenged the order extending the time for presenting the final report under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) and the rejection of their default bail applications filed under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Justice Deepak Gupta, in the judgment, emphasized the importance of the Public Prosecutor independently applying his mind and submitting a report indicating the progress of the investigation and compelling reasons for seeking detention beyond 180 days. The court noted that the Public Prosecutor had fulfilled these requirements and had served notice to the accused.

The court further examined the non-receipt of the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report as a compelling reason for the extension. It held that the investigating agency had made efforts to obtain the report within the prescribed time and the non-receipt of the report was beyond their control. Therefore, the court found the extension of time justified.

"The investigating agency cannot be faulted for not filing the challan due to non-completion of investigation for want of FSL report. Once all the necessary steps had been taken by the investigating agency, it was certainly a compelling reason for them for not filing the challan within 180 days," stated Justice Deepak Gupta in the judgment.

Consequently, the court upheld the order extending the time for investigation and the denial of default bail, stating that the petitioners were rightly declined default bail as the time for investigation had been extended.

Date of Decision: 07.07.2023

Amit vs State of Haryana

Latest Legal News