Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

P&H High Court Upholds Extension of Investigation Time and Denial of Default Bail in Narcotics Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, 7th July 2023 - In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the extension of investigation time and the denial of default bail in a narcotics case. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, addressed two petitions arising from the same proceedings related to an FIR registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).

The petitioners had challenged the order extending the time for presenting the final report under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) and the rejection of their default bail applications filed under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Justice Deepak Gupta, in the judgment, emphasized the importance of the Public Prosecutor independently applying his mind and submitting a report indicating the progress of the investigation and compelling reasons for seeking detention beyond 180 days. The court noted that the Public Prosecutor had fulfilled these requirements and had served notice to the accused.

The court further examined the non-receipt of the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report as a compelling reason for the extension. It held that the investigating agency had made efforts to obtain the report within the prescribed time and the non-receipt of the report was beyond their control. Therefore, the court found the extension of time justified.

"The investigating agency cannot be faulted for not filing the challan due to non-completion of investigation for want of FSL report. Once all the necessary steps had been taken by the investigating agency, it was certainly a compelling reason for them for not filing the challan within 180 days," stated Justice Deepak Gupta in the judgment.

Consequently, the court upheld the order extending the time for investigation and the denial of default bail, stating that the petitioners were rightly declined default bail as the time for investigation had been extended.

Date of Decision: 07.07.2023

Amit vs State of Haryana

Latest Legal News