Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

P&H High Court Upholds Extension of Investigation Time and Denial of Default Bail in Narcotics Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, 7th July 2023 - In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the extension of investigation time and the denial of default bail in a narcotics case. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, addressed two petitions arising from the same proceedings related to an FIR registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).

The petitioners had challenged the order extending the time for presenting the final report under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) and the rejection of their default bail applications filed under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Justice Deepak Gupta, in the judgment, emphasized the importance of the Public Prosecutor independently applying his mind and submitting a report indicating the progress of the investigation and compelling reasons for seeking detention beyond 180 days. The court noted that the Public Prosecutor had fulfilled these requirements and had served notice to the accused.

The court further examined the non-receipt of the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report as a compelling reason for the extension. It held that the investigating agency had made efforts to obtain the report within the prescribed time and the non-receipt of the report was beyond their control. Therefore, the court found the extension of time justified.

"The investigating agency cannot be faulted for not filing the challan due to non-completion of investigation for want of FSL report. Once all the necessary steps had been taken by the investigating agency, it was certainly a compelling reason for them for not filing the challan within 180 days," stated Justice Deepak Gupta in the judgment.

Consequently, the court upheld the order extending the time for investigation and the denial of default bail, stating that the petitioners were rightly declined default bail as the time for investigation had been extended.

Date of Decision: 07.07.2023

Amit vs State of Haryana

Latest Legal News