Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Passport Renewal Cannot be Denied Based on Pending Criminal Cases: MP HC

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, presided over by Hon'ble Shri Justice Subodh Abhyankar, has pronounced that passport renewal cannot be denied solely on the grounds of pending criminal cases against the applicant. The Court's decision came in response to a writ petition filed by Abu Zar Rangwala, seeking the renewal of his passport.

The petitioner's passport renewal had been withheld due to two pending criminal cases registered against him under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The respondents relied on Gazette Notification No.G.S.R No.298(E) dated 14.04.1976 issued by the Ministry of External Affairs to argue against the renewal.

In its observation, the Court drew attention to a prior judgment dated 09.05.2023 (W.P. No.6229/2023) where it interpreted the Gazette Notification. The Court noted that the Gazette Notification was meant to apply when individuals intended to depart from India and required permission from the concerned court. However, the present case pertained to passport renewal and not departure from the country. The Court emphasized the distinction between seeking passport renewal and intending to leave India.

"The Gazette Notification pertains to those intending to depart from India, not to passport renewal," the Court observed, debunking the argument against renewal based on the Notification.

The Court clarified that the Gazette Notification does not pose a legal impediment to passport renewal in cases where individuals are not intending to leave the country. Accordingly, the Court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to renew the petitioner's passport within three months from the date of the certified copy of the order.

The Court made it clear that while passport renewal would be granted, it does not automatically grant permission to travel abroad. Individuals with pending criminal cases would still need separate permission from the concerned courts to travel outside the country.

This ruling, echoing the principles of justice and individual rights, will likely impact similar cases in the future and could lead to a more nuanced approach in cases involving passport renewals and pending criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision: 14th August, 2023

ABUZAR RANGWALA vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY

Latest Legal News