Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Passport Renewal Cannot be Denied Based on Pending Criminal Cases: MP HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, presided over by Hon'ble Shri Justice Subodh Abhyankar, has pronounced that passport renewal cannot be denied solely on the grounds of pending criminal cases against the applicant. The Court's decision came in response to a writ petition filed by Abu Zar Rangwala, seeking the renewal of his passport.

The petitioner's passport renewal had been withheld due to two pending criminal cases registered against him under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The respondents relied on Gazette Notification No.G.S.R No.298(E) dated 14.04.1976 issued by the Ministry of External Affairs to argue against the renewal.

In its observation, the Court drew attention to a prior judgment dated 09.05.2023 (W.P. No.6229/2023) where it interpreted the Gazette Notification. The Court noted that the Gazette Notification was meant to apply when individuals intended to depart from India and required permission from the concerned court. However, the present case pertained to passport renewal and not departure from the country. The Court emphasized the distinction between seeking passport renewal and intending to leave India.

"The Gazette Notification pertains to those intending to depart from India, not to passport renewal," the Court observed, debunking the argument against renewal based on the Notification.

The Court clarified that the Gazette Notification does not pose a legal impediment to passport renewal in cases where individuals are not intending to leave the country. Accordingly, the Court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to renew the petitioner's passport within three months from the date of the certified copy of the order.

The Court made it clear that while passport renewal would be granted, it does not automatically grant permission to travel abroad. Individuals with pending criminal cases would still need separate permission from the concerned courts to travel outside the country.

This ruling, echoing the principles of justice and individual rights, will likely impact similar cases in the future and could lead to a more nuanced approach in cases involving passport renewals and pending criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision: 14th August, 2023

ABUZAR RANGWALA vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY

Latest Legal News