Lack Of Boundaries In Sale Deed Not Fatal To Title If Plot Number & Parent Title Are Sufficiently Identifiable: Calcutta High Court Terror Perception Of Underworld Justifies Delay In Invoking MCOCA; Purely Civil Disputes Can Metamorphose Into Criminal Offence: Bombay High Court Identical Wills Executed By Spouses On Same Day Not Necessarily 'Mutual Wills' Restricting Power Of Alienation: Delhi High Court Written Notice Not Mandatory For Revoking Permission Under Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act: Gujarat High Court Wife Cannot Maintain Complaint Against Husband Under Senior Citizens Act; Not Intended For Spousal Disputes: Karnataka High Court Mere Presence At Scene Or Facilitation Without Intent To Aid Crime Does Not Amount To Abetment: Delhi High Court Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court

“Once a mortgage always a mortgage” -SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The plaintiff is in appeal before this Court. The plaintiff is the Mortgagee under Ram Lal, Mortgagor.  The grievance of the appellants is that the Mortgage was 45 years before filing of the suit, therefore, they have become owners of the suit property.  The Full Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court, in “Ram Kishan & Ors. Vs. Sheo Ram & Ors.”, has held that there is no limitation period in case of usufructuary mortgage.  “Once a mortgage always a mortgage” was the principle applied.  The said Judgment has been upheld by this Court in “Singh Ram (D) Through LRS Vs. Sheo Ram & Ors.” reported in (2014) 9 SCC 185.

In fact, there is a reference to the Special Leave Petition filed against the decision of Full Bench.  It is the same Special Leave Petition which has been decided in Singh Ram (D) (Supra).

In view of above, the civil appeal is dismissed.

Order Date - 25.09.2021

RAM RATTAN (DEAD) BY LRS.  VERSUS DEVI RAM & ORS. 

Latest Legal News