"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Offence Converted from Murder to Culpable Homicide: Apex Court Alters Conviction Under IPC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has made a significant ruling in the case of Motiram Pandurang Lathad v. The State of Maharashtra, where the appellant’s conviction was altered from Section 302 (Murder) to Section 304 Part II (Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder) under the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Facts and Issues: The case centered on an incident where the appellant was initially accused of murder under Section 302 IPC. The key issue was whether the appellant's actions, which led to a person's death during a fight, constituted murder or culpable homicide, considering the absence of an intention to kill.

Intention in Commission of Offense: The Court observed that the appellant did not intend to commit murder. The deceased intervened in a fight between the appellant and another individual, resulting in his accidental death. This lack of intention was pivotal in requalifying the offence (Para 3, 6).

Period of Custody Considered: The Court noted that the appellant had already served 14 years in prison, excluding remission. Since this duration exceeded the maximum punishment for Section 304 Part II IPC, the Court ruled in favor of the appellant’s immediate release (Para 8).

Decision: The Supreme Court ordered the immediate release of Motiram Pandurang Lathad from Amaravati Central Prison, provided he is not involved in any other offense. The appeal was thus allowed in part, marking a significant decision in the realm of criminal jurisprudence related to the interpretation of intention under the IPC.

Date of Decision: 9th February 2024

Motiram Pandurang Lathad v. The State of Maharashtra

Similar News