MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Offence Converted from Murder to Culpable Homicide: Apex Court Alters Conviction Under IPC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has made a significant ruling in the case of Motiram Pandurang Lathad v. The State of Maharashtra, where the appellant’s conviction was altered from Section 302 (Murder) to Section 304 Part II (Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder) under the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Facts and Issues: The case centered on an incident where the appellant was initially accused of murder under Section 302 IPC. The key issue was whether the appellant's actions, which led to a person's death during a fight, constituted murder or culpable homicide, considering the absence of an intention to kill.

Intention in Commission of Offense: The Court observed that the appellant did not intend to commit murder. The deceased intervened in a fight between the appellant and another individual, resulting in his accidental death. This lack of intention was pivotal in requalifying the offence (Para 3, 6).

Period of Custody Considered: The Court noted that the appellant had already served 14 years in prison, excluding remission. Since this duration exceeded the maximum punishment for Section 304 Part II IPC, the Court ruled in favor of the appellant’s immediate release (Para 8).

Decision: The Supreme Court ordered the immediate release of Motiram Pandurang Lathad from Amaravati Central Prison, provided he is not involved in any other offense. The appeal was thus allowed in part, marking a significant decision in the realm of criminal jurisprudence related to the interpretation of intention under the IPC.

Date of Decision: 9th February 2024

Motiram Pandurang Lathad v. The State of Maharashtra

Latest Legal News