Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |    

Not Named In FIR - Doctor Got Anticipatory Bail In POSCO and SCST Act: Orissa High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Orissa has granted anticipatory bail to Dr. Satyendra Prakash Verma, a petitioner in a case involving serious charges under the POCSO Act, IPC, and the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Justice Sashikanta Mishra, presiding over the case, remarked that the absence of direct allegations against the petitioner in the FIR played a crucial role in the decision.

The case, registered as ABLAPL No. 50 of 2024, came under the spotlight after the petitioner, a doctor, was implicated during the investigation for his role in facilitating the delivery of a child. The child was born to a minor victim who alleged exploitation by the principal accused, Sanjeet Mahato.

Justice Mishra, in his judgment, highlighted, “There is not a whisper of allegation against the petitioner by the informant-victim much less of commission of the offence under Section 3 of SC & ST (PA) Act.” This observation was pivotal in determining the maintainability of the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

The court also addressed the preliminary objection raised by the State regarding the maintainability of the anticipatory bail application under the SC & ST (PA) Act. Referring to various Supreme Court and High Court precedents, Justice Mishra clarified that the bar under Section 18 and 18-A of the SC & ST (PA) Act does not apply if a prima facie case under the Act is not made out.

In concluding the judgment, the court directed, “In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released by the arresting officer on such terms and conditions as he may deem fit and proper to impose.”

This ruling brings to light the nuanced application of legal provisions concerning anticipatory bail, especially in sensitive cases involving minors and scheduled castes and tribes. The decision is seen as a significant precedent in balancing the rights of the accused with the severity of the allegations, especially in cases where the accused’s direct involvement is not clearly established.                                                  

Date of Decision: 25 January 2024

Dr. Satyendra Prakash Verma VS State of Odisha & another

 

Similar News