Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Non-Bailable Warrant Issued Without Summons: High Court of Kerala Quashesed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court, presided over by Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, set aside a non-bailable warrant issued against an accused in an assault case, emphasizing the necessity of following due procedure before resorting to such measures. The decision was made in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 821 of 2024, involving Mansoor B.H. and Sakeena Beegum as petitioners.

The court observed, “The intention behind providing the above category of cases is to avoid the unreasonable action of issuing a non-bailable warrant against the accused without even verifying whether they had actually been served with summons or whether they have been prevented from co-operating with the investigation for any reasons beyond their control” (Para 7). This statement underlines the court’s commitment to ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal guidelines before issuing warrants.

Justice Thomas’s order highlighted the guidelines laid down in Satendar Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation [2021 (10) SCC 773], which categorize offenses and prescribe specific procedures for issuing warrants. The petitioner, accused of offenses under Sections 323, 324, 341, 308, and 427 r/w Section 34 of the IPC, falls under Category-A – offenses punishable with imprisonment of 7 years or less.

The court found that the Magistrate had hastily issued a non-bailable warrant without following the due process of first issuing a summons and then a bailable warrant, in case of non-appearance. “Of course, in appropriate cases, the Magistrate can issue non-bailable warrants to the accused. However, such instances must be confined to exceptional situations” (Para 9), the judgment stated, clarifying the circumstances under which such warrants may be issued.

Concluding the judgment, the High Court directed the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Nedumangad, to consider positively any application for recall of the warrant and for grant of bail, provided it is filed by the petitioner within 15 days.

Date of Decision: 25 January 2024

MANSOOR.B.H. VS STATE OF KERALA

 

Similar News