Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court

Non-Bailable Warrant Issued Without Summons: High Court of Kerala Quashesed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court, presided over by Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, set aside a non-bailable warrant issued against an accused in an assault case, emphasizing the necessity of following due procedure before resorting to such measures. The decision was made in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 821 of 2024, involving Mansoor B.H. and Sakeena Beegum as petitioners.

The court observed, “The intention behind providing the above category of cases is to avoid the unreasonable action of issuing a non-bailable warrant against the accused without even verifying whether they had actually been served with summons or whether they have been prevented from co-operating with the investigation for any reasons beyond their control” (Para 7). This statement underlines the court’s commitment to ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal guidelines before issuing warrants.

Justice Thomas’s order highlighted the guidelines laid down in Satendar Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation [2021 (10) SCC 773], which categorize offenses and prescribe specific procedures for issuing warrants. The petitioner, accused of offenses under Sections 323, 324, 341, 308, and 427 r/w Section 34 of the IPC, falls under Category-A – offenses punishable with imprisonment of 7 years or less.

The court found that the Magistrate had hastily issued a non-bailable warrant without following the due process of first issuing a summons and then a bailable warrant, in case of non-appearance. “Of course, in appropriate cases, the Magistrate can issue non-bailable warrants to the accused. However, such instances must be confined to exceptional situations” (Para 9), the judgment stated, clarifying the circumstances under which such warrants may be issued.

Concluding the judgment, the High Court directed the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Nedumangad, to consider positively any application for recall of the warrant and for grant of bail, provided it is filed by the petitioner within 15 days.

Date of Decision: 25 January 2024

MANSOOR.B.H. VS STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News