Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Non-Bailable Warrant Issued Without Summons: High Court of Kerala Quashesed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court, presided over by Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, set aside a non-bailable warrant issued against an accused in an assault case, emphasizing the necessity of following due procedure before resorting to such measures. The decision was made in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 821 of 2024, involving Mansoor B.H. and Sakeena Beegum as petitioners.

The court observed, “The intention behind providing the above category of cases is to avoid the unreasonable action of issuing a non-bailable warrant against the accused without even verifying whether they had actually been served with summons or whether they have been prevented from co-operating with the investigation for any reasons beyond their control” (Para 7). This statement underlines the court’s commitment to ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal guidelines before issuing warrants.

Justice Thomas’s order highlighted the guidelines laid down in Satendar Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation [2021 (10) SCC 773], which categorize offenses and prescribe specific procedures for issuing warrants. The petitioner, accused of offenses under Sections 323, 324, 341, 308, and 427 r/w Section 34 of the IPC, falls under Category-A – offenses punishable with imprisonment of 7 years or less.

The court found that the Magistrate had hastily issued a non-bailable warrant without following the due process of first issuing a summons and then a bailable warrant, in case of non-appearance. “Of course, in appropriate cases, the Magistrate can issue non-bailable warrants to the accused. However, such instances must be confined to exceptional situations” (Para 9), the judgment stated, clarifying the circumstances under which such warrants may be issued.

Concluding the judgment, the High Court directed the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Nedumangad, to consider positively any application for recall of the warrant and for grant of bail, provided it is filed by the petitioner within 15 days.

Date of Decision: 25 January 2024

MANSOOR.B.H. VS STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News