Property Allotted In Lieu Of Ancestral Land Left In Pakistan Retains Coparcenary Character; Karta Cannot Gift It Away: Punjab & Haryana HC Bail Applicant Under 'Solemn Obligation' To Disclose Criminal History; Material Suppression Disentitles Discretionary Relief: Orissa High Court Mother Surreptitiously Marrying Away Daughter Without Father’s Knowledge Amount To Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Grants Divorce Time Is Generally Not The Essence Of Contract In Sale Of Immovable Property; Unilateral Notice Cannot Alter Mutually Agreed Terms: Himachal Pradesh High Court Mere Use Of Surname No Defence If Adoption Is Dishonest & Causes Confusion In Pharma Trade: Delhi High Court Restrains 'Reddy Pharmaceuticals' Complainant’s Failure To Provide Specific Loan Details & Evidence Of Parties' Involvement In Ponzi Scheme Rebuts Section 139 NI Act Presumption: Calcutta High Court Statutory Mandate Of Section 17-B: Payment Of Minimum Wages Means Revised Rates From Time To Time, Not Frozen Amount: Delhi High Court Reporting Court Proceedings & Good Faith Complaints To Authorities Not Defamation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Summoning Order Appointment Obtained Via Fraud Vitiates Initial Entry; Article 311 Protection Not Available To Such Employees: Allahabad High Court Surviving Spouse’s Elevation To Second In Line Of Succession Not ‘Manifestly Arbitrary’: Bombay High Court Upholds Goa Succession Act Amendments Patent Rights Stand Exhausted Once Components Are Sourced From Authorized Market Dealers; Royalty Cannot Be Calculated On Entire Product: Delhi High Court FCI Cannot Unilaterally Reduce Rent Or Recover 'Excess' Payment Without Landlord's Consent & Notice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Judicial Sanctity Cannot Be Given To Adulterous Relationships; No Habeas Corpus For Married Woman Living With Husband: Himachal Pradesh High Court Recoveries From Open Spaces Without Proof Of Concealment Don't Qualify Under Section 27 Evidence Act: Supreme Court Large Time Gap In 'Last Seen Together' Theory Snaps Chain Of Circumstances; Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Non-Recovery Of Mobile Phone Or Video Not Fatal To Criminal Intimidation Charge If Victim's Testimony Is Credible: Supreme Court Threat To Upload Private Video Online Violates Woman's Sexual Autonomy, Amounts To 'Imputing Unchastity' Under Sec 506 IPC: Supreme Court Intention To Kill Essential For Section 307 IPC Conviction; Nature Of Injury Not Sole Determinant: Supreme Court Intention To Commit Murder Cannot Be Presumed Merely Because Injury Was Dangerous To Life: Supreme Court Alters Conviction To Section 325 IPC Supreme Court Cancels Bail Of Accused Who Absconded For 42 Days Post-Bail Revocation; Says Contumacious Conduct Bars Fresh Relief High Court Cannot Grant Fresh Bail By Ignoring Supreme Court’s Earlier Order Cancelling Bail Without Change In Circumstances: Supreme Court Mutation Entries Supported By Registered Sale Deeds For Long Period Relevant To Establish Possession: Supreme Court Allegation Of Fraud In Registered Documents Must Be Supported By Foundational Facts; Adverse Inference Drawn If Plaintiff Avoids Witness Box: Supreme Court Commercial Courts Must Assign Reasons For Not Passing Conditional Orders In Summary Judgment Applications: Calcutta High Court Friendly Loan Without Commercial Consideration Not A 'Legally Enforceable Debt' Under Section 138 NI Act: Jharkhand High Court Commercial Courts Act: ₹3 Lakh ‘Specified Value’ Amendment Is Self-Operative; No Separate Govt Notification Required: Andhra Pradesh HC Full Bench Drug Inspector’s Prosecution Voids If Specific Area Of Jurisdiction Is Not Notified In Official Gazette: Kerala High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC | Photostat Copies Of Sale Deeds Not Admissible As Additional Evidence To Fill Gaps In Trial Stage: Punjab & Haryana HC

No Mandate in Recruitment Rules for Subject-Wise Specification in Home Science - Supreme Court Upholds KPSC Lecturer Notification

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled in favor of the Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) regarding the recruitment of lecturers in Home Science. The Court found that there is no requirement in the recruitment rules for specifying subject specializations within the field of Home Science for lecturer positions.

The appeal was against the decision of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal and the High Court, which had quashed a KPSC notification for recruiting 18 lecturers in Home Science, citing the lack of subject specialization details. The appellants argued that this requirement was not mandated by the governing recruitment rules.

Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, delivering the judgment, emphasized, "Service jurisprudence must begin and end with rules that govern the process." The Court scrutinized the Karnataka Education Department Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1964, and the Special Recruitment Rules, 1993. They noted that these rules only require a Master's Degree in Home Science, without a need for specialization, for teaching undergraduate students.

The Court pointed out the High Court's error in extending its review beyond the stipulated rules, stating, "If the High Court had confined itself to the basic features of judicial review, it would have avoided committing the error that it did."

The judgment also referenced an affidavit from the University Grants Commission (UGC), supporting the non-requirement of subject-wise classification for Home Science lecturer posts.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the judgments of the High Court and the Tribunal. The recruitment process based on the KPSC notification was upheld.

Date of Decision: February 22, 2024

SMT. VIDYA K. & ORS. VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

Latest Legal News