Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

No leniency for brutal rapist-murderer: Supreme Court commutes death penalty to fixed term of 30 years in jail

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has modified the sentence of Kashi Nath Singh @ Kallu Singh, who was convicted for rape and murder of a 14-year-old girl in 2007. The Trial Court had awarded him the death penalty, but the High Court of Jharkhand commuted it to life imprisonment without any benefit of remission. The appellant challenged the judgment of the High Court in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court found no merit in the submission of the appellant that he could be extended the benefit of remission. The court considered the severity of the offense and the rights of the victim and her family members. However, keeping in view the appellant's age at the time of the offense and the possibility of his reformation, the court modified the sentence to a fixed term of 30 years without any benefit of remission. The appellant will be released from jail only after serving the full sentence of 30 years, excluding the period of imprisonment already undergone.

The facts of the case, as per the High Court's order, were that the victim had gone to take a bath in the village pond along with the wife and daughter of a neighbor. When the neighbor's wife and daughter returned, the victim did not. Her brother, mother, and neighbor went in search of her and found her dead in a nearby field, with several injuries on her body, including rape. The appellant was seen assaulting her by a stone and fled upon seeing them. The post-mortem report confirmed rape and multiple injuries leading to her death.

The Supreme Court noted that the appellant's guilt was proved beyond reasonable doubt, and there was no challenge to his conviction. The court modified the sentence in the interest of justice, ensuring the appellant serves a substantial period in jail.

Kashi Nath Singh @ Kallu Singh vs The State of Jharkhand  

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/20-Apr-2023-KASHI-NATH-VS-STATE-NON.pdf"]

Latest Legal News