Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

No leniency for brutal rapist-murderer: Supreme Court commutes death penalty to fixed term of 30 years in jail

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has modified the sentence of Kashi Nath Singh @ Kallu Singh, who was convicted for rape and murder of a 14-year-old girl in 2007. The Trial Court had awarded him the death penalty, but the High Court of Jharkhand commuted it to life imprisonment without any benefit of remission. The appellant challenged the judgment of the High Court in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court found no merit in the submission of the appellant that he could be extended the benefit of remission. The court considered the severity of the offense and the rights of the victim and her family members. However, keeping in view the appellant's age at the time of the offense and the possibility of his reformation, the court modified the sentence to a fixed term of 30 years without any benefit of remission. The appellant will be released from jail only after serving the full sentence of 30 years, excluding the period of imprisonment already undergone.

The facts of the case, as per the High Court's order, were that the victim had gone to take a bath in the village pond along with the wife and daughter of a neighbor. When the neighbor's wife and daughter returned, the victim did not. Her brother, mother, and neighbor went in search of her and found her dead in a nearby field, with several injuries on her body, including rape. The appellant was seen assaulting her by a stone and fled upon seeing them. The post-mortem report confirmed rape and multiple injuries leading to her death.

The Supreme Court noted that the appellant's guilt was proved beyond reasonable doubt, and there was no challenge to his conviction. The court modified the sentence in the interest of justice, ensuring the appellant serves a substantial period in jail.

Kashi Nath Singh @ Kallu Singh vs The State of Jharkhand  

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/20-Apr-2023-KASHI-NATH-VS-STATE-NON.pdf"]

Latest Legal News