"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

No Evidence of Offence Committed on Caste Basis: Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings in Abetment and SCST Act Case: ""

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India today delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Prabhat Kumar Mishra versus The State of U.P. & Anr., quashing all criminal proceedings against Prabhat Kumar Mishra in a case involving allegations of abetment of suicide and offences under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Legal Point of the Judgement: The apex court focused on two primary legal aspects: the allegation of abetment to suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and the applicability of Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The judgment's central legal issue revolved around whether the actions of Prabhat Mishra constituted 'abetment to suicide' and if the offense was committed on a caste basis as required under the SC/ST Act.

Facts and Issues: The case emerged from the unfortunate suicide of Data Ram, a Senior Clerk in the Child Welfare Board, who took his life in 2002, leaving behind a suicide note. The note implicated Mishra, the District Savings Officer in Kannauj District, alleging psychological pressure and harassment. Mishra, challenging the charges, approached the Supreme Court following the Allahabad High Court's refusal to quash the proceedings.

Court’s Assessment: The Court, in its detailed assessment, observed that the prosecution under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act was illegal as there was no evidence that the offense was committed on a caste basis. Deliberating on the parameters of abetment under Section 306 of the IPC, the court found that these were not met in Mishra's case. It relied on similar judgments like Netai Dutta v. State of W.B. and M. Mohan v. State to substantiate its decision. The suicide note, according to the Court, did not illustrate acts or omissions by Mishra that constituted abetment. It indicated frustration and pressure unrelated to Mishra, and the initial closure report by the investigating agency supported non-prosecution.

Decision: The Supreme Court, in its decisive ruling, quashed the High Court order and all proceedings against Mishra under Section 306 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, thereby allowing the appeal.

Date of Decision: March 5, 2024

Prabhat Kumar Mishra @ Prabhat Mishra versus The State of U.P. & Anr.

Similar News