Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

No Evidence of Offence Committed on Caste Basis: Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings in Abetment and SCST Act Case: ""

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India today delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Prabhat Kumar Mishra versus The State of U.P. & Anr., quashing all criminal proceedings against Prabhat Kumar Mishra in a case involving allegations of abetment of suicide and offences under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Legal Point of the Judgement: The apex court focused on two primary legal aspects: the allegation of abetment to suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and the applicability of Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The judgment's central legal issue revolved around whether the actions of Prabhat Mishra constituted 'abetment to suicide' and if the offense was committed on a caste basis as required under the SC/ST Act.

Facts and Issues: The case emerged from the unfortunate suicide of Data Ram, a Senior Clerk in the Child Welfare Board, who took his life in 2002, leaving behind a suicide note. The note implicated Mishra, the District Savings Officer in Kannauj District, alleging psychological pressure and harassment. Mishra, challenging the charges, approached the Supreme Court following the Allahabad High Court's refusal to quash the proceedings.

Court’s Assessment: The Court, in its detailed assessment, observed that the prosecution under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act was illegal as there was no evidence that the offense was committed on a caste basis. Deliberating on the parameters of abetment under Section 306 of the IPC, the court found that these were not met in Mishra's case. It relied on similar judgments like Netai Dutta v. State of W.B. and M. Mohan v. State to substantiate its decision. The suicide note, according to the Court, did not illustrate acts or omissions by Mishra that constituted abetment. It indicated frustration and pressure unrelated to Mishra, and the initial closure report by the investigating agency supported non-prosecution.

Decision: The Supreme Court, in its decisive ruling, quashed the High Court order and all proceedings against Mishra under Section 306 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, thereby allowing the appeal.

Date of Decision: March 5, 2024

Prabhat Kumar Mishra @ Prabhat Mishra versus The State of U.P. & Anr.

Latest Legal News