MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

No Evidence of Offence Committed on Caste Basis: Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings in Abetment and SCST Act Case: ""

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India today delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Prabhat Kumar Mishra versus The State of U.P. & Anr., quashing all criminal proceedings against Prabhat Kumar Mishra in a case involving allegations of abetment of suicide and offences under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Legal Point of the Judgement: The apex court focused on two primary legal aspects: the allegation of abetment to suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and the applicability of Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The judgment's central legal issue revolved around whether the actions of Prabhat Mishra constituted 'abetment to suicide' and if the offense was committed on a caste basis as required under the SC/ST Act.

Facts and Issues: The case emerged from the unfortunate suicide of Data Ram, a Senior Clerk in the Child Welfare Board, who took his life in 2002, leaving behind a suicide note. The note implicated Mishra, the District Savings Officer in Kannauj District, alleging psychological pressure and harassment. Mishra, challenging the charges, approached the Supreme Court following the Allahabad High Court's refusal to quash the proceedings.

Court’s Assessment: The Court, in its detailed assessment, observed that the prosecution under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act was illegal as there was no evidence that the offense was committed on a caste basis. Deliberating on the parameters of abetment under Section 306 of the IPC, the court found that these were not met in Mishra's case. It relied on similar judgments like Netai Dutta v. State of W.B. and M. Mohan v. State to substantiate its decision. The suicide note, according to the Court, did not illustrate acts or omissions by Mishra that constituted abetment. It indicated frustration and pressure unrelated to Mishra, and the initial closure report by the investigating agency supported non-prosecution.

Decision: The Supreme Court, in its decisive ruling, quashed the High Court order and all proceedings against Mishra under Section 306 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, thereby allowing the appeal.

Date of Decision: March 5, 2024

Prabhat Kumar Mishra @ Prabhat Mishra versus The State of U.P. & Anr.

Latest Legal News