Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Muslim Girl is Turns 15 Once Competent to Marry a Person of her Choice: PB&HR HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Last week, the Punjab And Haryana High Court granted protection to a 16-year-old Muslim girl who married a 21-year-old Muslim man, noting that she is of Marriageable Age under Muslim Personal Law.

The Bench of Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi was essentially hearing a protection petition filed by the couple (both Muslims) who had married according to Muslim rites and ceremonies. The couple argued before the court that in Muslim law, puberty and adulthood are synonymous and that it is presumed that a person attains adulthood at 15 years of age.Further, it is argued that a Muslim boy or girl who has reached puberty is free to marry whomever he or she chooses, and the guardian has no authority to interfere.

The petitioners' attorney cited numerous decisions of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, including the decision in Yunus Khan v. State of Haryana and Others. [2014(3) RCR (Criminal) 518.

Their further argument was that their life and liberty are in grave danger at the hands of respondents Nos. 5 to 7, and despite their representation to the Pathankot Senior Superintendent of Police, no action has been taken.

The petitioners' attorney argued that they would be satisfied at this stage if directives were issued mandating a timely and legally compliant decision on their petition.

The Court began by noting that in the Yunus Khan case, it was determined that the marriage of a Muslim girl is governed by Muslim personal law.

"The marriage of a Muslim girl is clearly governed by the Muslim Personal Law, as stated in a number of rulings cited above. According to Article 195 of Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla's book, "Principles of Mohammedan Law," petitioner No. 2 was of legal age to enter a marriage contract with a person of her choosing. It is stated that Petitioner No. 1 is older than 21 years old. Accordingly, both petitioners are of marriageable age under Muslim Personal Law.

It should be noted that, according to Article 195 of the book "Principles of Mohammedan Law by Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla," every Mahomedan of sound mind who has attained puberty may enter into a marriage contract, and puberty is presumed, in the absence of evidence, upon completion of 15 years of age.

"The Court cannot close its eyes to the fact that the petitioners' apprehension must be addressed. Because the petitioners married against the wishes of their family members, they cannot be deprived of their fundamental rights as outlined in the Indian Constitution."

In light of the preceding discussion, the petition was dismissed with an order to the respondent No. 2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot, to decide the petitioners' representation and take the appropriate legal action.

In India, the legal age of marriage for girls is 18 and for boys it is 21. The Special Marriage Act of 1954 and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act of 2006 govern this.

Under Muslim law, however, marriage or Nikah is a contract. Adults are permitted by Islamic law to marry of their own free will. These are the requirements for a valid Muslim marriage:

• Both parties must adhere to Islam;

• Both should have reached puberty;

• There must be an offer and acceptance, as well as the presence of two witnesses;

• Dower and Mehar, as well as

• Absence of a prohibited relationship degree.

In the Hadiya Case (Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M. and others), the Supreme Court ruled that the legitimacy of a woman's marriage choice cannot be challenged.

The Union Cabinet approved the proposal to increase the legal age of marriage for women from 18 to 21 on December 15, 2021. This change would bring the legal age of marriage for women to 21 years, the same as for men.

Smriti Irani, the Union Minister for Women and Child Development, introduced the "Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021" in the Lok Sabha, which seeks to raise the age of marriage for women across all religions to 21.

D.D: 13 JUNE 2022

Gulam Deen and another Versus State of Punjab and others 

Latest Legal News