Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance POCSO Presumption Is Not a Dead Letter, But ‘Sterling Witness’ Test Still Governs Conviction: Bombay High Court High Courts Cannot Routinely Entertain Contempt Petitions Beyond One Year: Madras High Court Declines Contempt Plea Filed After Four Years Courts Cannot Reject Suit by Weighing Evidence at Threshold: Delhi High Court Restores Discrimination Suit by Indian Staff Against Italian Embassy Improvised Testimonies and Dubious Recovery Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Sale with Repurchase Condition is Not a Mortgage: Bombay High Court Reverses Redemption Decree After 27-Year Delay Second Transfer Application on Same Grounds is Not Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Legal Position under Section 24 CPC Custodial Interrogation Is Not Punitive — Arrest Cannot Be Used as a Tool to Humiliate in Corporate Offence Allegations: Delhi High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Partnership Act | Eviction Suit by Unregistered Firm Maintainable if Based on Statutory Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Reasonable Grounds Under Section 37 of NDPS Act Cannot Be Equated with Proof; They Must Reflect More Than Suspicion, But Less Than Conviction: J&K HC Apprehension to Life Is a Just Ground for Transfer When Roots Lie in History of Ideological Violence: Bombay High Court Transfers Defamation Suits Against Hamid Dabholkar, Nikhil Wagle From Goa to Maharashtra

Muslim Girl is Turns 15 Once Competent to Marry a Person of her Choice: PB&HR HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Last week, the Punjab And Haryana High Court granted protection to a 16-year-old Muslim girl who married a 21-year-old Muslim man, noting that she is of Marriageable Age under Muslim Personal Law.

The Bench of Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi was essentially hearing a protection petition filed by the couple (both Muslims) who had married according to Muslim rites and ceremonies. The couple argued before the court that in Muslim law, puberty and adulthood are synonymous and that it is presumed that a person attains adulthood at 15 years of age.Further, it is argued that a Muslim boy or girl who has reached puberty is free to marry whomever he or she chooses, and the guardian has no authority to interfere.

The petitioners' attorney cited numerous decisions of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, including the decision in Yunus Khan v. State of Haryana and Others. [2014(3) RCR (Criminal) 518.

Their further argument was that their life and liberty are in grave danger at the hands of respondents Nos. 5 to 7, and despite their representation to the Pathankot Senior Superintendent of Police, no action has been taken.

The petitioners' attorney argued that they would be satisfied at this stage if directives were issued mandating a timely and legally compliant decision on their petition.

The Court began by noting that in the Yunus Khan case, it was determined that the marriage of a Muslim girl is governed by Muslim personal law.

"The marriage of a Muslim girl is clearly governed by the Muslim Personal Law, as stated in a number of rulings cited above. According to Article 195 of Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla's book, "Principles of Mohammedan Law," petitioner No. 2 was of legal age to enter a marriage contract with a person of her choosing. It is stated that Petitioner No. 1 is older than 21 years old. Accordingly, both petitioners are of marriageable age under Muslim Personal Law.

It should be noted that, according to Article 195 of the book "Principles of Mohammedan Law by Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla," every Mahomedan of sound mind who has attained puberty may enter into a marriage contract, and puberty is presumed, in the absence of evidence, upon completion of 15 years of age.

"The Court cannot close its eyes to the fact that the petitioners' apprehension must be addressed. Because the petitioners married against the wishes of their family members, they cannot be deprived of their fundamental rights as outlined in the Indian Constitution."

In light of the preceding discussion, the petition was dismissed with an order to the respondent No. 2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot, to decide the petitioners' representation and take the appropriate legal action.

In India, the legal age of marriage for girls is 18 and for boys it is 21. The Special Marriage Act of 1954 and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act of 2006 govern this.

Under Muslim law, however, marriage or Nikah is a contract. Adults are permitted by Islamic law to marry of their own free will. These are the requirements for a valid Muslim marriage:

• Both parties must adhere to Islam;

• Both should have reached puberty;

• There must be an offer and acceptance, as well as the presence of two witnesses;

• Dower and Mehar, as well as

• Absence of a prohibited relationship degree.

In the Hadiya Case (Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M. and others), the Supreme Court ruled that the legitimacy of a woman's marriage choice cannot be challenged.

The Union Cabinet approved the proposal to increase the legal age of marriage for women from 18 to 21 on December 15, 2021. This change would bring the legal age of marriage for women to 21 years, the same as for men.

Smriti Irani, the Union Minister for Women and Child Development, introduced the "Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021" in the Lok Sabha, which seeks to raise the age of marriage for women across all religions to 21.

D.D: 13 JUNE 2022

Gulam Deen and another Versus State of Punjab and others 

Latest Legal News