Subsequent Declaration Of Juvenility Does Not Vitiate Conviction On Merits: Supreme Court Borrowers Cannot Ignore Bank Accounting Systems And Suspense Accounts To Claim Arbitrary Reductions In Loan Dues: Supreme Court Re-employed Judicial Officers Cannot Claim 6th Pay Commission Scales: Supreme Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Erroneously Exercising Review Jurisdiction On 'Mistaken Notion', Restores Employee's ACP Benefits Trademark Infringement: Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff On Use Of Brand Name Even If Written Statement Is Not On Record: Supreme Court 'Interest And Welfare Of Child Would Be Best Served': Supreme Court Invokes Parens Patriae In Contempt Plea; Revokes Own Custody Order Mere Absence From MCA Records Cannot Absolve Accused Under Section 138 NI Act If Prima Facie Role Is Shown: Punjab & Haryana High Court Incomplete Or Defective Real Estate Application Cannot Claim Deemed Registration Under Section 5(2) Of RERA Act: Orissa High Court Mere Criminal Antecedents Cannot Justify Invoking 'Organized Crime' Offence Under Section 111 BNS Without Fulfilling Statutory Ingredients: Madhya Pradesh High Court 'Testator's Character & Prior Gifts Justify Unequal Distribution': Madras High Court Upholds Holographic Will Minority Status Cannot Arrest Limitation Period For Appeal If Minor Was Represented By Natural Guardian In Original Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Admission Of Property Boundaries In Family Partition Deeds Destroys Coparceners' Claim That Land Remains Joint Ancestral Property: Karnataka High Court Mesne Profits Must Reflect Open Market Letting Value Rather Than Static Contractual Rates: Delhi High Court Law Graduates Who Fail To Clear AIBE Within Two Years Cannot Practice In Any Court, Tribunal Or Revenue Authority: Allahabad High Court Bombay High Court Slams 'Growing Tendency' To Bypass GST Appeals, Says 'Natural Justice' Not A Blanket Excuse For Writ Petitions Proportionate Cost Only Can Be Awarded On Decreed Amount, Not On Total Plaint Valuation: Kerala High Court

Market Value, Not Contracted Price, Determines Deduction -  Supreme Court Upholds Assessee's Right to Higher Deduction on Market Value of Electricity

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a latest judgment that clarifies several vital aspects of the Income Tax Act, the Supreme Court, comprising Justices B. V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, delivered a significant ruling on December 6, 2023, impacting businesses nationwide. The apex court unequivocally held that the market value of electricity, and not the contracted sale rate to State Electricity Boards, is the determinant factor for claiming higher tax deductions under Section 80 IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

In the detailed judgment, the court observed, "Market value, not contracted price, determines the quantum of deduction under Section 80 IA of the Income Tax Act." This observation sets a precedent for assessing the market value of electricity in relation to tax deductions, ensuring a fairer and more accurate assessment for companies involved in power generation and distribution.

The case, revolving around an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against M/S Jindal Steel & Power Limited and associated companies, brought to the forefront several issues related to tax deductions, depreciation on assets, and the classification of carbon credits. The Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Tribunal and High Court's views paves the way for a more nuanced approach in computing tax liabilities for energy companies.

In addition to the primary issue of electricity valuation, the court also addressed the depreciation method on assets. The judgment upheld the assessee's right to choose the Written Down Value (WDV) method for depreciation, stating that there is no specific statutory mode required for exercising such an option. Justice Bhuyan emphasized, "The law does not mandate a specific mode of exercising the option for depreciation methods."

Furthermore, the apex court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding expenditure claims related to payments made to a consultant, affirming the Tribunal and High Court's decision. However, the issue of whether carbon credit is a capital or revenue receipt was left open for future adjudication, as it was not contested by the revenue at the High Court level.

Date of Decision: 6th December 2023

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX  VS M/S JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED

Latest Legal News