Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Main Eviction Suit Kept in Cold Storage: Meghalaya High Court Directs Expedited Disposal Amid Miscellaneous Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent pronouncement on 31st October 2023, the High Court of Meghalaya, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, pointed out that the main eviction suit concerning the ‘Sweety Studio’ premises at Laitumkhrah, Shillong has been “kept in cold storage” while miscellaneous proceedings were aggressively pursued by the parties involved.

The case, styled as Smti. Clara Batskhem Nonghuloo Vs. Smti. Anju R.T. Khriam, originated from an eviction suit filed back in 2019, which saw a series of miscellaneous applications and proceedings, leading to multiple orders from the lower courts. The appeal brought before the High Court was initially a Second Appeal but was converted to a Civil Revision Application upon the appellant’s request, given its origin from miscellaneous applications within the eviction suit.

The crux of the matter revolved around the restoration of electricity to the suit premises, which became a point of contention amid other issues related to tenancy and rent payment. The appellant sought to challenge the orders that were in favor of the respondent regarding the restoration of electricity and other related matters.

In its observation, the High Court noted, “A fact that cannot be ignored in this respect, is that, the respondent/defendant while aggressively contesting the Misc. Cases filed in the suit, since its institution on 11.07.2019, neglected to file her written statement, which was done only on 05.03.2021.” This delay in filing the written statement was highlighted as one of the factors contributing to the prolonged adjudication of the main eviction suit.

The Court, after examining the impugned order dated 20.05.2022 and other connected orders, directed that the “findings on the other issues, which are yet to be framed and still to be tried by the Trial Court, are to be disregarded.” It upheld the direction for the restoration of electricity to the premises, allowing the respondent to continue business operations during the pendency of the eviction suit.

Furthermore, the Court directed the Trial Court to take up the eviction suit for “expeditious disposal” and complete it preferably within a period of eighteen months from the date of receipt of records from the High Court.

This directive by the High Court aims to steer the focus back to the main eviction suit and ensure a timely resolution, setting aside the distractions caused by the miscellaneous proceedings that have prolonged the adjudication process.

Date of Decision: 31.10.2023

Smti. Clara Batskhem Nonghuloo VS Smti. Anju R.T. Khriam   

Latest Legal News