Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Long Incarceration Justifies Bail Despite Stringent Provisions Under UAPA: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Shoma Kanti Sen in Elgar Parishad Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices Aniruddha Bose and Augustine George Masih, granted bail to Shoma Kanti Sen, a senior citizen implicated in offenses under the UAPA and IPC. The court emphasized that Sen’s prolonged detention of nearly six years without charge framing, combined with her age and health issues, warranted bail notwithstanding the serious allegations under UAPA. The ruling, delivered on April 5th, 2024, underscores the court’s recognition of long incarceration as a valid ground for bail, in alignment with the Constitutional mandate under Article 21.

The apex court scrutinized the nature of allegations and evidence against Sen under various sections of the UAPA, finding no prima facie case warranting stringent bail restrictions under the Act. The court noted that mere association with accused individuals does not constitute proof of involvement in terrorist activities.

Sen was implicated following the Elgar Parishad event, accused of conspiring to overthrow the state and disrupt communal harmony. The case involved a wide array of charges under the IPC and UAPA, with the primary allegations relating to Sen’s association with CPI (Maoist), a banned terrorist organization, and her alleged involvement in raising funds and recruiting members for terrorist activities.

Association with CPI (Maoist): The court found no direct evidence of Sen’s involvement in terrorist activities or her membership in CPI (Maoist).

Alleged Involvement in Terrorist Activities: The court noted that mere attendance in meetings and promoting ideologies does not prima facie establish a case for terrorist activities under UAPA.

Fundraising Allegations: The evidence presented failed to corroborate any direct role of Sen in raising or receiving funds for terrorist purposes.

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s judgment and granted bail to Shoma Kanti Sen. The bail was subject to several conditions, including restrictions on travel and regular reporting to the local police station. The court warned that any violation might lead to bail cancellation.

Date of Decision: April 5, 2024

Shoma Kanti Sen versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Latest Legal News