MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Long Incarceration Justifies Bail Despite Stringent Provisions Under UAPA: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Shoma Kanti Sen in Elgar Parishad Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices Aniruddha Bose and Augustine George Masih, granted bail to Shoma Kanti Sen, a senior citizen implicated in offenses under the UAPA and IPC. The court emphasized that Sen’s prolonged detention of nearly six years without charge framing, combined with her age and health issues, warranted bail notwithstanding the serious allegations under UAPA. The ruling, delivered on April 5th, 2024, underscores the court’s recognition of long incarceration as a valid ground for bail, in alignment with the Constitutional mandate under Article 21.

The apex court scrutinized the nature of allegations and evidence against Sen under various sections of the UAPA, finding no prima facie case warranting stringent bail restrictions under the Act. The court noted that mere association with accused individuals does not constitute proof of involvement in terrorist activities.

Sen was implicated following the Elgar Parishad event, accused of conspiring to overthrow the state and disrupt communal harmony. The case involved a wide array of charges under the IPC and UAPA, with the primary allegations relating to Sen’s association with CPI (Maoist), a banned terrorist organization, and her alleged involvement in raising funds and recruiting members for terrorist activities.

Association with CPI (Maoist): The court found no direct evidence of Sen’s involvement in terrorist activities or her membership in CPI (Maoist).

Alleged Involvement in Terrorist Activities: The court noted that mere attendance in meetings and promoting ideologies does not prima facie establish a case for terrorist activities under UAPA.

Fundraising Allegations: The evidence presented failed to corroborate any direct role of Sen in raising or receiving funds for terrorist purposes.

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s judgment and granted bail to Shoma Kanti Sen. The bail was subject to several conditions, including restrictions on travel and regular reporting to the local police station. The court warned that any violation might lead to bail cancellation.

Date of Decision: April 5, 2024

Shoma Kanti Sen versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Latest Legal News