Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

Live -In – Relationship: Protection of life and liberty is a basic feature of the Constitution of India: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

In a groundbreaking judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana affirmed the constitutional right to life and liberty for individuals in live-in relationships, setting a significant precedent in the realm of personal law and individual rights.

The case, titled Kiran Kaur and another vs. State of Punjab and others, was presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi. The court meticulously addressed the petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking protection for the life and liberty of the petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship and facing threats from relatives.

Constitutional Sanctity to Personal Choices: The court emphasized, “Every person, moreso, a major, has the right to live his/her life with a person of his/her choice subject to the law as applicable.” This assertion highlights the court’s recognition of personal autonomy in intimate relationships.

Legal Precedence on Live-in Relationships: Citing previous judgments, the court acknowledged the growing acceptance and legal validation of live-in relationships in India. Justice Bedi noted, “The concept of live-in-relationships has crept into our society from western nations...this shows that social acceptance for live-in-relationships is on the increase.”

Protection of Life and Liberty: The judgment focused on the importance of safeguarding the life and liberty of individuals, stating, “The protection of life and liberty is a basic feature of the Constitution of India.”

Non-Intrusion into Legality of Relationship: The court deliberately refrained from commenting on the legality of the relationship between the petitioners, underscoring that the immediate concern was their protection.

The court directed the police to assess the threat perception to the petitioners and take appropriate action in accordance with the law. This direction reflects a balanced approach, safeguarding the petitioners’ rights while not precluding legal action against them for any unlawful activities.

Date of Decision: 29.11.2023

Kiran Kaur and another VS State of Punjab and others 

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    16 May 2026 9:36 AM
Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court
  • by sayum
    16 May 2026 9:36 AM
Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court
  • by sayum
    16 May 2026 9:35 AM
Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court
  • by sayum
    16 May 2026 9:35 AM
Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court
  • by sayum
    16 May 2026 9:34 AM
Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court
  • by sayum
    16 May 2026 9:33 AM
"Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants