Subsequent Declaration Of Juvenility Does Not Vitiate Conviction On Merits: Supreme Court Borrowers Cannot Ignore Bank Accounting Systems And Suspense Accounts To Claim Arbitrary Reductions In Loan Dues: Supreme Court Re-employed Judicial Officers Cannot Claim 6th Pay Commission Scales: Supreme Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Erroneously Exercising Review Jurisdiction On 'Mistaken Notion', Restores Employee's ACP Benefits Trademark Infringement: Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff On Use Of Brand Name Even If Written Statement Is Not On Record: Supreme Court 'Interest And Welfare Of Child Would Be Best Served': Supreme Court Invokes Parens Patriae In Contempt Plea; Revokes Own Custody Order Mere Absence From MCA Records Cannot Absolve Accused Under Section 138 NI Act If Prima Facie Role Is Shown: Punjab & Haryana High Court Incomplete Or Defective Real Estate Application Cannot Claim Deemed Registration Under Section 5(2) Of RERA Act: Orissa High Court Mere Criminal Antecedents Cannot Justify Invoking 'Organized Crime' Offence Under Section 111 BNS Without Fulfilling Statutory Ingredients: Madhya Pradesh High Court 'Testator's Character & Prior Gifts Justify Unequal Distribution': Madras High Court Upholds Holographic Will Minority Status Cannot Arrest Limitation Period For Appeal If Minor Was Represented By Natural Guardian In Original Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Admission Of Property Boundaries In Family Partition Deeds Destroys Coparceners' Claim That Land Remains Joint Ancestral Property: Karnataka High Court Mesne Profits Must Reflect Open Market Letting Value Rather Than Static Contractual Rates: Delhi High Court Law Graduates Who Fail To Clear AIBE Within Two Years Cannot Practice In Any Court, Tribunal Or Revenue Authority: Allahabad High Court Bombay High Court Slams 'Growing Tendency' To Bypass GST Appeals, Says 'Natural Justice' Not A Blanket Excuse For Writ Petitions Proportionate Cost Only Can Be Awarded On Decreed Amount, Not On Total Plaint Valuation: Kerala High Court

Live -In – Relationship: Protection of life and liberty is a basic feature of the Constitution of India: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

In a groundbreaking judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana affirmed the constitutional right to life and liberty for individuals in live-in relationships, setting a significant precedent in the realm of personal law and individual rights.

The case, titled Kiran Kaur and another vs. State of Punjab and others, was presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi. The court meticulously addressed the petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking protection for the life and liberty of the petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship and facing threats from relatives.

Constitutional Sanctity to Personal Choices: The court emphasized, “Every person, moreso, a major, has the right to live his/her life with a person of his/her choice subject to the law as applicable.” This assertion highlights the court’s recognition of personal autonomy in intimate relationships.

Legal Precedence on Live-in Relationships: Citing previous judgments, the court acknowledged the growing acceptance and legal validation of live-in relationships in India. Justice Bedi noted, “The concept of live-in-relationships has crept into our society from western nations...this shows that social acceptance for live-in-relationships is on the increase.”

Protection of Life and Liberty: The judgment focused on the importance of safeguarding the life and liberty of individuals, stating, “The protection of life and liberty is a basic feature of the Constitution of India.”

Non-Intrusion into Legality of Relationship: The court deliberately refrained from commenting on the legality of the relationship between the petitioners, underscoring that the immediate concern was their protection.

The court directed the police to assess the threat perception to the petitioners and take appropriate action in accordance with the law. This direction reflects a balanced approach, safeguarding the petitioners’ rights while not precluding legal action against them for any unlawful activities.

Date of Decision: 29.11.2023

Kiran Kaur and another VS State of Punjab and others 

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    14 August 2026 3:21 PM
Minority Status Cannot Arrest Limitation Period For Appeal If Minor Was Represented By Natural Guardian In Original Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court
  • by sayum
    14 August 2026 3:20 PM
Mere Criminal Antecedents Cannot Justify Invoking 'Organized Crime' Offence Under Section 111 BNS Without Fulfilling Statutory Ingredients: Madhya Pradesh High Court
  • by sayum
    14 August 2026 3:19 PM
Mere Admission Of Property Boundaries In Family Partition Deeds Destroys Coparceners' Claim That Land Remains Joint Ancestral Property: Karnataka High Court
  • by sayum
    14 August 2026 3:18 PM
Mesne Profits Must Reflect Open Market Letting Value Rather Than Static Contractual Rates: Delhi High Court
  • by sayum
    14 August 2026 3:17 PM
'Testator's Character & Prior Gifts Justify Unequal Distribution': Madras High Court Upholds Holographic Will
  • by sayum
    14 August 2026 3:17 PM
Law Graduates Who Fail To Clear AIBE Within Two Years Cannot Practice In Any Court, Tribunal Or Revenue Authority: Allahabad High Court