Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

"Justice has nothing to do with what goes on in the courtroom; Justice is what comes out of a courtroom," Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India set aside the High Court's verdict convicting Munna Pandey in a rape and murder case involving a 10-year-old girl. The bench consisting of Hon'ble Justices B.R. Gavai, J.B. Pardiwala, and Prashant Kumar Mishra raised serious concerns about the "serious lapses in the investigation" and the "inadequate 313 examination of the accused."

In their observation, the Court emphasized, "justice is not merely about courtroom proceedings but about the outcome that ensures truth and fairness," thereby remitting the case for a fresh trial.

The Court scrutinized the glaring shortcomings in the investigation, such as the failure to obtain a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report, lack of medical examinations of the accused, and absence of DNA profiling evidence, which were vital in a case of such severe nature.

Besides, the Court stressed the role of a judge in a fair trial, stating that judges "are not mere spectators or recording machines but play an active role in questioning witnesses, seeking relevant information, and upholding the pursuit of truth and justice."

The bench also criticized the High Court's approach in making assumptions regarding the appellant being the sole perpetrator, neglecting the presence of a co-accused and other significant evidence.

Notably, the Court laid great emphasis on the concept of a fair trial, stating it to be "deeply rooted in history, enshrined in the Constitution, and embodied in criminal trial statutes." It underlined the importance of "impartiality and fairness of all parties involved," especially in cases involving capital punishment.

The apex court urged the High Court to expedite the case, considering the appellant's long incarceration, and even suggested appointing legal representation for the appellant if necessary.

This ruling has drawn attention to the critical aspects of criminal procedure, the necessity for a meticulous investigation, and the indispensable role of the judiciary in upholding justice and fairness.

Date of Decision: 04 September 2023

MUNNA PANDEY  vs STATE OF BIHAR          

Latest Legal News