High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

"Justice has nothing to do with what goes on in the courtroom; Justice is what comes out of a courtroom," Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India set aside the High Court's verdict convicting Munna Pandey in a rape and murder case involving a 10-year-old girl. The bench consisting of Hon'ble Justices B.R. Gavai, J.B. Pardiwala, and Prashant Kumar Mishra raised serious concerns about the "serious lapses in the investigation" and the "inadequate 313 examination of the accused."

In their observation, the Court emphasized, "justice is not merely about courtroom proceedings but about the outcome that ensures truth and fairness," thereby remitting the case for a fresh trial.

The Court scrutinized the glaring shortcomings in the investigation, such as the failure to obtain a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report, lack of medical examinations of the accused, and absence of DNA profiling evidence, which were vital in a case of such severe nature.

Besides, the Court stressed the role of a judge in a fair trial, stating that judges "are not mere spectators or recording machines but play an active role in questioning witnesses, seeking relevant information, and upholding the pursuit of truth and justice."

The bench also criticized the High Court's approach in making assumptions regarding the appellant being the sole perpetrator, neglecting the presence of a co-accused and other significant evidence.

Notably, the Court laid great emphasis on the concept of a fair trial, stating it to be "deeply rooted in history, enshrined in the Constitution, and embodied in criminal trial statutes." It underlined the importance of "impartiality and fairness of all parties involved," especially in cases involving capital punishment.

The apex court urged the High Court to expedite the case, considering the appellant's long incarceration, and even suggested appointing legal representation for the appellant if necessary.

This ruling has drawn attention to the critical aspects of criminal procedure, the necessity for a meticulous investigation, and the indispensable role of the judiciary in upholding justice and fairness.

Date of Decision: 04 September 2023

MUNNA PANDEY  vs STATE OF BIHAR          

Latest Legal News