MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

It is the duty of the tribunal/Court to award 'just compensation; Motor Vehicles Act is admittedly a beneficial legislation: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Deceased in Motor Accident Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court has delivered a crucial judgement on the quantification of compensation in cases involving fatal motor accidents. The bench presided over by Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin addressed appeals concerning the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Narnaul, in the tragic demise of a 24-year-old male.

The appeals, identified as FAO-5166-2018 and FAO-6426-2018, revolved around the compensation for the deceased, initially fixed based on his monthly income and potential future earnings. The litigation contested the methods used to calculate the income and the applicable deductions and multipliers under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

The deceased, a 24-year-old bachelor, was previously employed with a monthly income of Rs.11,840. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal included deductions and a multiplier that the appellants, an insurance company, and the claimants, the deceased's family, challenged. The insurance company argued for a lower assessment based on minimum wages, while the claimants sought enhanced compensation citing the deceased's future prospects and lack of compensation for consortium.

Income Assessment: The court dismissed the argument for income assessment based on the Minimum Wages Act, affirming that the assessment should reflect a just compensation that does not strictly adhere to minimum wages. The judgment referred to several precedents indicating that the tribunal must consider the specific circumstances of each case and the nature of the deceased's employment.

Deductions and Future Prospects: The court adjusted the standard deduction from one-third to 50% considering the deceased's bachelor status. Moreover, it recognized the necessity of a 40% addition to the calculated income for future prospects, aligning with the principles established in landmark judgments.

Conventional Damages and Consortium: The court increased the awards for conventional damages such as loss of estate and funeral expenses by 20%, and importantly, acknowledged the emotional and support losses by awarding loss of consortium to the parents of the deceased.

Ultimately, the court revised the total compensation to Rs.19,22,208, with an interest rate of 9% per annum from the date of the claim filing till realization, which also includes the enhanced awards for future prospects, conventional damages, and loss of consortium.

This judgement underscores the judiciary's role in interpreting compensation in accident claims, emphasizing flexibility and fairness over rigid adherence to minimum standards. It reaffirms the court's commitment to ensuring that compensation awards serve to reasonably mitigate the financial impact on victims' families while reflecting the potential future contributions of the deceased.

Date of Decision: April 19, 2024

Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Bimla Devi & Ors.

Latest Legal News