Cheque Bounce Cases Should Ordinarily Be Sent To Mediation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Calls For Mediation In NI Act Matters 138 NI Act | Belated Plea Of Forged Signatures Cannot Be Used To Delay Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Handwriting Expert Sections 332 & 333 IPC | Lawful Discharge Of Duty Must Be Proved, Mere Status As Public Servant Not Enough: Allahabad High Court Bus Conductor Accused of Assaulting Traffic Inspectors Custody With Biological Mother Cannot Ordinarily Be Treated As Illegal Detention: Delhi High Court Refuses Habeas Corpus For Return Of Child To Canada Foreign Custody Orders Must Yield To Welfare Of Child: Delhi High Court Refuses To Enforce Canadian Return Order Through Habeas Corpus Possible Criminal Racket Luring Young Girls Through Self-Proclaimed Peers And Tantriks Must Be Examined: J&K High Court Orders Wider Judicial Scrutiny Nomenclature Cannot Determine Constitutional Entitlement: Supreme Court Strikes Down Exclusion Of ‘Academic Arrangement’ Employees From Regularisation Testimony Of Related Witnesses Cannot Be Discarded Merely For Relationship: Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction 149 IPC | Presence In Unlawful Assembly Is Enough For Murder Liability”: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Directly Recruited Engineers Entitled To Seniority From Date Of Initial Appointment Including Training Period: Supreme Court Section 32 Evidence Act | If There Is Even An Iota Of Suspicion, Dying Declaration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Framing A Case On Public Perceptions And Personal Predilections Ends Up In A Mess: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal In Alleged Parricide Arson Case When Oppression Petition Is Pending, Courts Must Ensure The Subject Matter Does Not Disappear Before Adjudication: Supreme Court Orders Status Quo In ₹1000 Crore Redevelopment Dispute Parties Cannot Participate In Arbitration And Later Challenge The Process Only After An Unfavourable Outcome : Supreme Court ICSID Clause Is Only A Fail-Safe Mechanism, Not A Restriction: Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal’s Constitution In MCGM Dispute Passive Euthanasia | 'Right To Die With Dignity Is An Intrinsic Facet Of Article 21': Supreme Court Permits Withdrawal Of Life Support Medical Board Must Record Reasons Before Denying Disability Pension To Armed Forces Personnel: Kerala High Court Grants Disability Pension To Air Force Corporal 138 NI Act | Directors Cannot Be Prosecuted If Company Is Not Made Accused: Allahabad High Court Quashes Cheque Bounce Cases Broad Daylight Removal of Goods by Known Creditors Is Not Theft: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Shopkeeper’s Insurance Claim Reservation Cannot Freeze Private Land Forever – Lapse Under Section 127 MRTP Act Operates Automatically: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Transfer On Marriage Cannot Defeat Helper’s First Right To Promotion: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Anganwadi Helper’s Promotion Where Accusations Are Prima Facie True, Statutory Bar Under Section 43D(5) UAPA Operates; Bail Cannot Be Granted: Jharkhand High Court Bomb Hurled At Head Of Victim Shows Clear Intention To Kill: Kerala High Court Upholds Life Sentence In Kannur Political Murder Case Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment

Interim Order Made Absolute for Operational Expenses – Supreme Court Stresses on Proper Accounting and Periodic Auditing for Smooth Functioning of Institutions”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has focused on the utilization of frozen accounts by petitioners for salary and institutional expenses under certain conditions. This decision, outlined in the judgement of the case “Operation Mobilization India & Ors. Vs. State of Telangana & Ors.”, addresses issues related to the freezing of accounts under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010.

The case originated from FIR No. 22 of 2016, which led to the freezing of the petitioners’ accounts by the CID Telangana State in November 2020. This action prompted the petitioners to approach the High Court, which upheld the account freeze, resulting in the current appeal to the Supreme Court. The issue at hand was the need for operational funds for educational and health institutions managed by the petitioners, amidst ongoing investigations under the FCRA.

Investigation Validity: The Court recognized the legitimacy of the investigation but expressed the necessity to balance it with the operational needs of the petitioners’ institutions.

Interim Relief Rationale: The Court, on April 7, 2021, provided interim relief allowing the use of frozen accounts for salary and institutional expenses, emphasizing the importance of maintaining comprehensive accounts.

Ongoing Investigations and Trials: The Court clarified that the ongoing investigations and trials in various courts should continue as per law, without any interference or observations on the merits of the case from the Supreme Court.

Contempt Petition: The Court chose not to delve into the contempt petition, leaving it to the discretion of the investigating agency or the Trial Court.

Requirement for Auditing: A key aspect of the judgement was the emphasis on proper auditing by a Chartered Accountant, with quarterly statements to be provided to the Investigating Officer or the Trial Court.

Interim Order Absolution: Ultimately, the Court made its interim order absolute, thereby allowing the petitioners to continue using the accounts for the defined purposes under strict financial scrutiny.

Decision: The petitions were disposed of with the Court making the interim order dated April 7, 2021, absolute. This allows the petitioners to use their frozen accounts for operational expenses, under the condition of strict financial discipline and auditing. The Court clarified that this order is solely for the smooth functioning of the educational and health institutions run by the petitioners and has not made any observation on the merits of the allegations.

Date of Decision: April 5, 2024

Operation Mobilization India & Ors. Vs. State of Telangana & Ors.

Latest Legal News