Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Interim Order Made Absolute for Operational Expenses – Supreme Court Stresses on Proper Accounting and Periodic Auditing for Smooth Functioning of Institutions”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has focused on the utilization of frozen accounts by petitioners for salary and institutional expenses under certain conditions. This decision, outlined in the judgement of the case “Operation Mobilization India & Ors. Vs. State of Telangana & Ors.”, addresses issues related to the freezing of accounts under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010.

The case originated from FIR No. 22 of 2016, which led to the freezing of the petitioners’ accounts by the CID Telangana State in November 2020. This action prompted the petitioners to approach the High Court, which upheld the account freeze, resulting in the current appeal to the Supreme Court. The issue at hand was the need for operational funds for educational and health institutions managed by the petitioners, amidst ongoing investigations under the FCRA.

Investigation Validity: The Court recognized the legitimacy of the investigation but expressed the necessity to balance it with the operational needs of the petitioners’ institutions.

Interim Relief Rationale: The Court, on April 7, 2021, provided interim relief allowing the use of frozen accounts for salary and institutional expenses, emphasizing the importance of maintaining comprehensive accounts.

Ongoing Investigations and Trials: The Court clarified that the ongoing investigations and trials in various courts should continue as per law, without any interference or observations on the merits of the case from the Supreme Court.

Contempt Petition: The Court chose not to delve into the contempt petition, leaving it to the discretion of the investigating agency or the Trial Court.

Requirement for Auditing: A key aspect of the judgement was the emphasis on proper auditing by a Chartered Accountant, with quarterly statements to be provided to the Investigating Officer or the Trial Court.

Interim Order Absolution: Ultimately, the Court made its interim order absolute, thereby allowing the petitioners to continue using the accounts for the defined purposes under strict financial scrutiny.

Decision: The petitions were disposed of with the Court making the interim order dated April 7, 2021, absolute. This allows the petitioners to use their frozen accounts for operational expenses, under the condition of strict financial discipline and auditing. The Court clarified that this order is solely for the smooth functioning of the educational and health institutions run by the petitioners and has not made any observation on the merits of the allegations.

Date of Decision: April 5, 2024

Operation Mobilization India & Ors. Vs. State of Telangana & Ors.

Latest Legal News