MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Interim Order Made Absolute for Operational Expenses – Supreme Court Stresses on Proper Accounting and Periodic Auditing for Smooth Functioning of Institutions”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has focused on the utilization of frozen accounts by petitioners for salary and institutional expenses under certain conditions. This decision, outlined in the judgement of the case “Operation Mobilization India & Ors. Vs. State of Telangana & Ors.”, addresses issues related to the freezing of accounts under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010.

The case originated from FIR No. 22 of 2016, which led to the freezing of the petitioners’ accounts by the CID Telangana State in November 2020. This action prompted the petitioners to approach the High Court, which upheld the account freeze, resulting in the current appeal to the Supreme Court. The issue at hand was the need for operational funds for educational and health institutions managed by the petitioners, amidst ongoing investigations under the FCRA.

Investigation Validity: The Court recognized the legitimacy of the investigation but expressed the necessity to balance it with the operational needs of the petitioners’ institutions.

Interim Relief Rationale: The Court, on April 7, 2021, provided interim relief allowing the use of frozen accounts for salary and institutional expenses, emphasizing the importance of maintaining comprehensive accounts.

Ongoing Investigations and Trials: The Court clarified that the ongoing investigations and trials in various courts should continue as per law, without any interference or observations on the merits of the case from the Supreme Court.

Contempt Petition: The Court chose not to delve into the contempt petition, leaving it to the discretion of the investigating agency or the Trial Court.

Requirement for Auditing: A key aspect of the judgement was the emphasis on proper auditing by a Chartered Accountant, with quarterly statements to be provided to the Investigating Officer or the Trial Court.

Interim Order Absolution: Ultimately, the Court made its interim order absolute, thereby allowing the petitioners to continue using the accounts for the defined purposes under strict financial scrutiny.

Decision: The petitions were disposed of with the Court making the interim order dated April 7, 2021, absolute. This allows the petitioners to use their frozen accounts for operational expenses, under the condition of strict financial discipline and auditing. The Court clarified that this order is solely for the smooth functioning of the educational and health institutions run by the petitioners and has not made any observation on the merits of the allegations.

Date of Decision: April 5, 2024

Operation Mobilization India & Ors. Vs. State of Telangana & Ors.

Latest Legal News